aiqbench analysis
This study applies standard machine learning algorithms like Random Forest and XGBoost to predict dengue infections using clinical data, focusing on model comparison and feature importance rather than novel AI architectures or quantum methods. While the application of ML to public health is relevant, the core contribution lies in algorithmic benchmarking and dataset analysis within a specific medical context, making it a case study in applied machine learning rather than a breakthrough in AI theory or infrastructure.
Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Dengue Infection Using Clinical and Hematological Data from Bangladesh: A Comparative Analysis of Benchmark and Extended Prediction Models
arXiv:2610.14813v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Dengue is a viral infection caused by the dengue virus (DENV) and a major public health concern in Bangladesh, where symptom overlap with other febrile illnesses complicates early diagnosis. This study compares Logistic Regression, Random Forest and XGBoost to predict dengue from clinical and hematological data using two Bangladeshi hospital datasets (2024, n=1,511; 2025, n=1,283) with SMOTE. Extended models outperformed benchmarks within 2024 (Random Forest ROC-AUC 0.640 to 0.661), with RDW-CV the most consistently influential added predictor. 2025 benchmark performance was higher (ROC-AUC 0.904), unexplained by class imbalance and possibly reflecting data quality. External validation is needed.
Abstract:Dengue is a viral infection caused by the dengue virus (DENV) and a major public health concern in Bangladesh, where symptom overlap with other febrile illnesses complicates early diagnosis. This study compares Logistic Regression, Random Forest and XGBoost to predict dengue from clinical and hematological data using two Bangladeshi hospital datasets (2024, n=1,511; 2025, n=1,283) with SMOTE. Extended models outperformed benchmarks within 2024 (Random Forest ROC-AUC 0.640 to 0.661), with RDW-CV the most consistently influential added predictor. 2025 benchmark performance was higher (ROC-AUC 0.904), unexplained by class imbalance and possibly reflecting data quality. External validation is needed.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2610.14813 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2610.14813v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.14813 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 191 words
Related coverage
How to build a cancer vaccine, and whether they will work this time
LessWrong · Jun 8, 2026

Reviewing failure modes in science as we prepare for AI researchers
LessWrong · Oct 8, 2026
Routine Blood Tests Outperform CRP for Distinguishing Bacterial From Viral Infection in Children
arXiv · Sep 21, 2026

AI in healthcare: applications and best practices
Databricks · Jul 24, 2026