Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This paper addresses the scarcity of Maltese text data by generating synthetic training images to fine-tune Tesseract 5 LSTM models, achieving a significant reduction in character error rates through multi-stream arbitration and diacritic restoration techniques. The approach demonstrates strong portability for related Low-Resource languages like Luxembourgish while releasing an open corpus derived from public legal and web sources to aid future research on underrepresented scripts.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

LV-ROVER-MLT: Low-Resource Maltese OCR by Synthetic Fine-Tuning and Multi-Stream Arbitration

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2607.00250v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Maltese OCR is constrained by the absence of a public, reusable paragraph-scale training corpus. We address this by generating synthetic Maltese line images, fine-tuning the Tesseract 5 LSTM, and combining five deterministic Tesseract configurations through anchor-preserving, lexicon-gated word-level arbitration. The method uses a fixed anchor stream, a longest-stream fallback, a confusion-based anchor corrector, and a Maltese-specific diacritic-restoration gate. Unlike canonical ROVER, candidate streams cannot restructure the anchor through insertions or deletions; they propose only eligible substitutions at aligned anchor positions. On the 422-paragraph development set of the DocEng 2026 Maltese OCR competition, the organizers' fine-tuned Tesseract baseline obtains CER 0.0234. Our pre-convention pipeline reaches CER 0.01317, a 44% reduction. Synthetic fine-tuning provides the largest single gain, while multi-stream arbitration contributes a further material reduction beyond the selected anchor, reaching CER 0.01220 in the current replay with paired-resampling support. A development-tuned label-convention normalization chain further reduces CER to 0.00700. We report recognition gains separately from benchmark-specific quote and dash normalization. We also evaluate portability on Hungarian and Luxembourgish. Luxembourgish improves significantly over our stock baseline, while the Hungarian result is inconclusive. Finally, we release a 36,803-pair Maltese OCR corpus derived from EUR-Lex and Wikipedia. The held-out competition result remains under organizer embargo and is not reported

Abstract:Maltese OCR is constrained by the absence of a public, reusable paragraph-scale training corpus. We address this by generating synthetic Maltese line images, fine-tuning the Tesseract 5 LSTM, and combining five deterministic Tesseract configurations through anchor-preserving, lexicon-gated word-level arbitration. The method uses a fixed anchor stream, a longest-stream fallback, a confusion-based anchor corrector, and a Maltese-specific diacritic-restoration gate. Unlike canonical ROVER, candidate streams cannot restructure the anchor through insertions or deletions; they propose only eligible substitutions at aligned anchor positions. On the 422-paragraph development set of the DocEng 2026 Maltese OCR competition, the organizers' fine-tuned Tesseract baseline obtains CER 0.0234. Our pre-convention pipeline reaches CER 0.01317, a 44% reduction. Synthetic fine-tuning provides the largest single gain, while multi-stream arbitration contributes a further material reduction beyond the selected anchor, reaching CER 0.01220 in the current replay with paired-resampling support. A development-tuned label-convention normalization chain further reduces CER to 0.00700. We report recognition gains separately from benchmark-specific quote and dash normalization. We also evaluate portability on Hungarian and Luxembourgish. Luxembourgish improves significantly over our stock baseline, while the Hungarian result is inconclusive. Finally, we release a 36,803-pair Maltese OCR corpus derived from EUR-Lex and Wikipedia. The held-out competition result remains under organizer embargo and is not reported

10 pages, including 8 pages of main text and references plus appendices. Working paper. The held-out DocEng 2026 competition result is under organizer embargo and is not reported

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)

arXiv:2607.00250 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2607.00250v3 [cs.CL] for this version)

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 251 words

Related coverage