Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This survey paper offers a structured overview of low-precision training methods for large language models, categorizing techniques by numerical format to address the hardware efficiency challenges inherent in scaling LLMs. By analyzing fixed-point, floating-point, and customized formats alongside quantization-aware approaches, it provides researchers with a unified framework essential for optimizing computational resources without sacrificing model robustness. The work highlights critical research directions aimed at improving deployment reliability while reducing the substantial barrier of training costs.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Low-Precision Training of Large Language Models: Methods, Challenges, and Opportunities

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2505.01043v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have achieved impressive performance across various domains. However, the substantial hardware resources required for their training present a significant barrier to efficiency and scalability. To mitigate this challenge, low-precision training techniques have been widely adopted, leading to notable advancements in training efficiency. Despite these gains, low-precision training involves several components, such as weights, activations, and gradients, each of which can be represented in different numerical formats. The resulting diversity has created a fragmented landscape in low-precision training research, making it difficult for researchers to gain a unified overview of the field. This survey provides a comprehensive review of existing low-precision training methods. To systematically organize these approaches, we categorize them into three primary groups based on their underlying numerical formats, which is a key factor influencing hardware compatibility, computational efficiency, and ease of reference for readers. The categories are (1) fixed-point and integer-based methods, (2) floating-point-based methods, and (3) customized format-based methods. Additionally, we discuss quantization-aware training approaches, which share key similarities with low-precision training during forward propagation. Beyond efficiency, we examine robustness and deployment reliability under low precision. Finally, we highlight several promising research directions to advance this field. A collection of papers discussed in this survey is provided in https://github.com/Hao840/Awesome-Low-Precision-Training.

Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) have achieved impressive performance across various domains. However, the substantial hardware resources required for their training present a significant barrier to efficiency and scalability. To mitigate this challenge, low-precision training techniques have been widely adopted, leading to notable advancements in training efficiency. Despite these gains, low-precision training involves several components, such as weights, activations, and gradients, each of which can be represented in different numerical formats. The resulting diversity has created a fragmented landscape in low-precision training research, making it difficult for researchers to gain a unified overview of the field. This survey provides a comprehensive review of existing low-precision training methods. To systematically organize these approaches, we categorize them into three primary groups based on their underlying numerical formats, which is a key factor influencing hardware compatibility, computational efficiency, and ease of reference for readers. The categories are (1) fixed-point and integer-based methods, (2) floating-point-based methods, and (3) customized format-based methods. Additionally, we discuss quantization-aware training approaches, which share key similarities with low-precision training during forward propagation. Beyond efficiency, we examine robustness and deployment reliability under low precision. Finally, we highlight several promising research directions to advance this field. A collection of papers discussed in this survey is provided in this https URL.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2505.01043 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2505.01043v2 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.01043 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 303 words

Related coverage