Skip to content
Off-topic for aiqbench

Off-topic for aiqbench

This story was gathered from a source we follow but falls outside AI and quantum coverage, so there is no aiqbench take for it.

Low Cost Eye Tracking for Vision Screening

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.31941v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This engineering study assesses gaze-assisted data acquisition during visual screening with a Gaze Quest implementation via webcam and GC308 near infrared camera with an Orlosky eye tracking pipeline. Ten subjects performed under both acquisition conditions. Accuracy of Tumbling E orientation, reported application logMAR value,and response latency were determined from keyboard responses and hence are behavioral outputs as opposed toeye tracker screening results. Frame-to-frame change in theangle between successive normalized gaze vectors (28.2degrees) served as the GC308 eye tracker derived diagnostic with an effective sampling rate of roughly 8 FPS. No screen target calibration or gaze to screen translation was done on the GC308 eye tracker output data for the current analysis and hence, these data represent acquisition stability and not gaze accuracy in relation to the target. The webcam pipeline relied on 25-point screen calibration. Because the display resolution and pixel pitch could not be retained in the records of the study, the reported application logMAR values cannot be viewed as measures of visual acuity in any way.

Abstract:This engineering study assesses gaze-assisted data acquisition during visual screening with a Gaze Quest implementation via webcam and GC308 near infrared camera with an Orlosky eye tracking pipeline. Ten subjects performed under both acquisition conditions. Accuracy of Tumbling E orientation, reported application logMAR value,and response latency were determined from keyboard responses and hence are behavioral outputs as opposed toeye tracker screening results. Frame-to-frame change in theangle between successive normalized gaze vectors (28.2degrees) served as the GC308 eye tracker derived diagnostic with an effective sampling rate of roughly 8 FPS. No screen target calibration or gaze to screen translation was done on the GC308 eye tracker output data for the current analysis and hence, these data represent acquisition stability and not gaze accuracy in relation to the target. The webcam pipeline relied on 25-point screen calibration. Because the display resolution and pixel pitch could not be retained in the records of the study, the reported application logMAR values cannot be viewed as measures of visual acuity in any way.

Robotics (cs.RO)

arXiv:2609.31941 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2609.31941v1 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.31941 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 261 words

Related coverage