aiqbench analysis
This study reveals a critical performance disparity in large language models where non-native English speakers receive systematically lower-quality responses, driven by the model's tendency to mirror higher-level rhetorical flaws rather than correcting surface errors like misspellings. The introduction of the FABLE dataset provides a controlled foundation for analyzing how specific linguistic features impact model output quality across 34 open-weight systems. These findings underscore an urgent need for bias mitigation strategies to ensure equitable AI performance for global, non-native English-speaking user bases.
Lost in Translation: Measuring the Effect of Non-Native English on End User Performance of Large Language Models
arXiv:2609.36214v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used by people whose first language is not English, yet these users have been shown to receive systematically lower-quality responses than fluent speakers. Which specific features of non-native English drive this gap remains unclear, because fluency is itself a composite of mechanical accuracy, vocabulary use, organization, and discourse coherence. Here, we introduce FABLE, a controlled dataset of 190,911 English prompt variants derived from 174K real user prompts for writing-related tasks. Evaluating responses from 34 open-weight LLMs, we find a clear asymmetry; while models do not propagate surface errors such as misspellings into their outputs, models do mirror higher-level rhetorical and lexical qualities present in the user's prompt. Further, the overall quality of responses differs substantially between the least- and most-fluent prompts. These results highlight a key LLM performance disparity for non-native English LLM users, resulting in both lower-quality and less-fluent answers.
Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used by people whose first language is not English, yet these users have been shown to receive systematically lower-quality responses than fluent speakers. Which specific features of non-native English drive this gap remains unclear, because fluency is itself a composite of mechanical accuracy, vocabulary use, organization, and discourse coherence. Here, we introduce FABLE, a controlled dataset of 190,911 English prompt variants derived from 174K real user prompts for writing-related tasks. Evaluating responses from 34 open-weight LLMs, we find a clear asymmetry; while models do not propagate surface errors such as misspellings into their outputs, models do mirror higher-level rhetorical and lexical qualities present in the user's prompt. Further, the overall quality of responses differs substantially between the least- and most-fluent prompts. These results highlight a key LLM performance disparity for non-native English LLM users, resulting in both lower-quality and less-fluent answers.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2609.36214 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2609.36214v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.36214 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 242 words
Related coverage
Links #3: 2026/06 Part 1
LessWrong · Jun 15, 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Sep 10, 2026
Controllable-CoT leads to covert reasoning capabilities
LessWrong · Sep 22, 2026

Digital States 2026: AI Moves From Experiment to Infrastructure
govtech.com · Sep 24, 2026