aiqbench analysis
This research addresses a critical optimization challenge in large time series models (LTSMs) where direct fine-tuning often leads to overfitting due to poorly conditioned non-convex loss landscapes. The proposed Smoothed Full Fine-tuning (SFF) technique improves trainability by linearly interpolating pre-trained weights with an auxiliary model to smooth the loss landscape, effectively escaping poor local minima while preserving learned knowledge. Validated across eight representative architectures, this method offers a robust solution for practitioners seeking to leverage pre-trained models without sacrificing performance or generalizability.
Lost in the Non-convex Loss Landscape: How to Fine-tune the Large Time Series Model?
arXiv:2606.08578v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recently, large time series models (LTSMs) have gained increasing attention due to their similarities to large language models, including flexible context length, scalability, and task generality, outperforming advanced task-specific models. However, prior studies indicate that pre-trained LTSMs may exhibit a poorly conditioned non-convex loss landscape, leading to limited trainability. As a result, direct fine-tuning tends to cause overfitting and suboptimal performance, sometimes even worse than training from scratch, substantially diminishing the benefits of pre-training. To overcome this limitation, we propose Smoothed Full Fine-tuning (SFF), a novel fine-tuning technology. Specifically, we construct an auxiliary LTSM via random initialization to obtain a smoother loss landscape, and then linearly interpolate its weights with those of the pre-trained model to smooth the original landscape. This process improves trainability while preserving pre-trained knowledge, thereby enabling more effective downstream fine-tuning. From an optimization perspective, SFF perturbs sharp minima without significantly harming flat regions, facilitating escape from poor local basins toward smoother and more generalizable solutions. Extensive experiments on benchmark datasets demonstrate consistent improvements across eight representative LTSMs, including Timer, TimesFM, MOMENT, UniTS, MOIRAI, Chronos, TTMs, and Sundial, on diverse downstream tasks. The code is available at the link: https://github.com/Meteor-Stars/SFF.
Abstract:Recently, large time series models (LTSMs) have gained increasing attention due to their similarities to large language models, including flexible context length, scalability, and task generality, outperforming advanced task-specific models. However, prior studies indicate that pre-trained LTSMs may exhibit a poorly conditioned non-convex loss landscape, leading to limited trainability. As a result, direct fine-tuning tends to cause overfitting and suboptimal performance, sometimes even worse than training from scratch, substantially diminishing the benefits of pre-training. To overcome this limitation, we propose Smoothed Full Fine-tuning (SFF), a novel fine-tuning technology. Specifically, we construct an auxiliary LTSM via random initialization to obtain a smoother loss landscape, and then linearly interpolate its weights with those of the pre-trained model to smooth the original landscape. This process improves trainability while preserving pre-trained knowledge, thereby enabling more effective downstream fine-tuning. From an optimization perspective, SFF perturbs sharp minima without significantly harming flat regions, facilitating escape from poor local basins toward smoother and more generalizable solutions. Extensive experiments on benchmark datasets demonstrate consistent improvements across eight representative LTSMs, including Timer, TimesFM, MOMENT, UniTS, MOIRAI, Chronos, TTMs, and Sundial, on diverse downstream tasks. The code is available at the link: this https URL.
This paper has been accepted by The Fourteenth International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2026). The code is available at the link \url{this https URL}
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2606.08578 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2606.08578v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.08578 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 238 words
Related coverage

Evaluating task vectors, unlearning and inoculation
LessWrong · Sep 20, 2026

How to Size GPUs for AI Inference and TCO Without Overspending
NVIDIA · Sep 1, 2026

Build a Physical AI model factory with NVIDIA Cosmos 3 on SageMaker HyperPod
AWS · Sep 4, 2026

Exploring self-distilled reasoning for supervised fine-tuning with Amazon Nova
AWS · Jul 21, 2026