aiqbench analysis
This research addresses a critical gap in Hierarchical Task Network (HTN) planning by adapting classical deordering techniques to remove redundant action constraints while preserving validity. The study demonstrates that these optimizations significantly reduce the number of ordering constraints and offer some reduction in critical path length, providing more flexible and efficient plans for complex hierarchical tasks.
Lose the Order, Keep the Hierarchy: Deordering HTN Plans
arXiv:2609.03912v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Hierarchical Task Network (HTN) planning is a powerful planning formalism based on task decomposition. Although most of the literature studied plan generation, comparatively less attention has been paid to post-plan optimization. In particular, plan deordering has been extensively studied in classical planning but remains under-researched in the HTN setting. Plan deordering removes unnecessary ordering constraints between actions in a plan whilst keeping the plan valid. In this paper, we adapt two established plan deordering techniques from classical planning by extending the techniques to account for hierarchical decomposition constraints. We evaluate our proposed approaches on the IPC 2023 Partial-Order HTN benchmarks and we compare them against Optiplan, an HTN planner that generates partially ordered plans directly. Our results show a substantial reduction in number of ordering constraints in both our implementations. Although we also observe a reduction in critical path length, the improvements are less pronounced.
Abstract:Hierarchical Task Network (HTN) planning is a powerful planning formalism based on task decomposition. Although most of the literature studied plan generation, comparatively less attention has been paid to post-plan optimization. In particular, plan deordering has been extensively studied in classical planning but remains under-researched in the HTN setting. Plan deordering removes unnecessary ordering constraints between actions in a plan whilst keeping the plan valid. In this paper, we adapt two established plan deordering techniques from classical planning by extending the techniques to account for hierarchical decomposition constraints. We evaluate our proposed approaches on the IPC 2023 Partial-Order HTN benchmarks and we compare them against Optiplan, an HTN planner that generates partially ordered plans directly. Our results show a substantial reduction in number of ordering constraints in both our implementations. Although we also observe a reduction in critical path length, the improvements are less pronounced.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2609.03912 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2609.03912v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.03912 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 239 words
Related coverage

Presentation: Beyond Prompting: Context Engineering and Memory Management for AI Systems at Scale
InfoQ · Jun 10, 2026
I don't think Claude is misaligned in 'Agentic Misalignment Summer 2026 - Motivated Mislabeling'
LessWrong · Jul 17, 2026
An Educational GEMM Ladder for Helios GPUs
AMD · Sep 14, 2026

Lattice-Based Cryptography Explained
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 15, 2026