aiqbench analysis
This research establishes that the geometric properties of Sparse Autoencoder (SAE) decoder spaces, such as neighbor density and cosine similarity, can predict feature steerability without requiring intervention sweeps. Validated across multiple model architectures including Gemma-2 and Llama-3.1, the findings offer a computationally efficient method to screen features for controllability before deployment. While the predictive signal weakens at deeper layer depths, this work provides a crucial pathway toward optimizing coefficient selection in mechanistic interpretability workflows.
Look Before You Steer: Geometry Predicts SAE Feature Steerability
arXiv:2609.22782v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Steering with SAE features requires per-feature coefficient tuning, which currently demands intervention sweeps. We ask whether properties of the SAE itself, computable before any forward pass, predict which features will be cheap or expensive to steer. We show that variation in SAE feature steerability is partially predicted by decoder-space geometry: neighbor density and maximum cosine similarity to nearby decoder directions, both computable from the SAE weight matrix before any intervention, rank features by how much steering they require for a fixed behavioral effect ($\rho$ up to $-0.546$, $p < 10^{-6}$, AUROC 0.610-0.822 across conditions; the signal is rank-based, consistent with grid discreteness). This geometry-steerability relationship replicates across two Gemma-2 model scales (2B and 9B), two SAE widths (16K and 65K), and is detectable cross-architecturally on Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct ($\rho = -0.266$, $n = 300$). On Qwen3-8B with BatchTopK SAEs, geometry predicts whether a feature is steerable at all but not the continuous ordering among responsive features, revealing a boundary condition tied to SAE training regime. The signal weakens at deep proportional layer depth in both models, where the cost of steering exceeds our intervention budget, a consistent depth boundary. These results provide preliminary evidence that pre-steering geometry can partially inform coefficient selection, offering a path toward screening features for controllability before deployment.
Abstract:Steering with SAE features requires per-feature coefficient tuning, which currently demands intervention sweeps. We ask whether properties of the SAE itself, computable before any forward pass, predict which features will be cheap or expensive to steer. We show that variation in SAE feature steerability is partially predicted by decoder-space geometry: neighbor density and maximum cosine similarity to nearby decoder directions, both computable from the SAE weight matrix before any intervention, rank features by how much steering they require for a fixed behavioral effect ($\rho$ up to $-0.546$, $p < 10^{-6}$, AUROC 0.610-0.822 across conditions; the signal is rank-based, consistent with grid discreteness). This geometry-steerability relationship replicates across two Gemma-2 model scales (2B and 9B), two SAE widths (16K and 65K), and is detectable cross-architecturally on Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct ($\rho = -0.266$, $n = 300$). On Qwen3-8B with BatchTopK SAEs, geometry predicts whether a feature is steerable at all but not the continuous ordering among responsive features, revealing a boundary condition tied to SAE training regime. The signal weakens at deep proportional layer depth in both models, where the cost of steering exceeds our intervention budget, a consistent depth boundary. These results provide preliminary evidence that pre-steering geometry can partially inform coefficient selection, offering a path toward screening features for controllability before deployment.
12 pages, 3 figures, 5 tables. Accepted at the Mechanistic Interpretability Workshop at ICML 2026 and AIW 2026 at COLM
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2609.22782 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.22782v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.22782 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 324 words
