Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This research dissects the mechanisms behind transfer learning in memorization tasks, distinguishing between trivial magnitude effects in final layers and non-trivial structural transfers driven by layer covariance. By quantifying how pre-training epochs directly translate to downstream efficiency, the study offers a principled framework for optimizing pre-training strategies in machine learning workflows. These findings provide critical insight into the fundamental architecture of neural network generalization beyond standard benchmarks.
Sources coveringarXiv, Quantum Zeitgeist
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Localizing Transfer Between Memorization Tasks

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.00771v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A central puzzle in transfer learning is why pre-training on one task can accelerate training or improve performance on another task, and what mechanisms underlie this transfer. In this work, we examine the transfer between memorization tasks of random input-output mappings. We find two surprising transfer patterns: equivalent transfer, where each additional pre-training epoch saves approximately one downstream fine-tuning epoch; and non-equivalent transfer, where pre-training on a mismatched task can be even more efficient than directly training on the downstream task itself. Through ablation experiments, we decompose and localize the transfer into two separate effects: a "trivial" magnitude-driven transfer in the last layer, and a "non-trivial" structure-driven transfer, partially attributable to the covariance of the other layers. These results advance our understanding of the underlying mechanisms of transfer learning and have the potential to lead to principled pre-training strategies.

Abstract:A central puzzle in transfer learning is why pre-training on one task can accelerate training or improve performance on another task, and what mechanisms underlie this transfer. In this work, we examine the transfer between memorization tasks of random input-output mappings. We find two surprising transfer patterns: equivalent transfer, where each additional pre-training epoch saves approximately one downstream fine-tuning epoch; and non-equivalent transfer, where pre-training on a mismatched task can be even more efficient than directly training on the downstream task itself. Through ablation experiments, we decompose and localize the transfer into two separate effects: a "trivial" magnitude-driven transfer in the last layer, and a "non-trivial" structure-driven transfer, partially attributable to the covariance of the other layers. These results advance our understanding of the underlying mechanisms of transfer learning and have the potential to lead to principled pre-training strategies.

17 pages, 10 figures. Accepted as a poster at the NeurIPS 2026 Workshop on Neural Network Artifacts as a New Data Modality

Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2610.00771 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2610.00771v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.00771 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 255 words

Related coverage