Skip to content
Off-topic for aiqbench

Off-topic for aiqbench

This story was gathered from a source we follow but falls outside AI and quantum coverage, so there is no aiqbench take for it.

Locality, Probability and the Relevance of History

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.41944v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Relativistic theory and experiments teach us that causal influences are constrained by the speed of light. Deterministic theories incorporate this lesson in $\textit{functional}$ terms: whether an event occurs or not is functionally determined by events that occur in its immediate causal past. In this paper we suggest a natural generalization of this constraint that applies to probabilistic theories: the $\textit{probability}$ that an event occurs is to be functionally determined by the $\textit{probability}$ of the event-occurrences in its immediate causal past. This constraint differs from Bell's criterion of local causality and turns out to imply it only under an additional assumption that requires history to be, in a sense, $\textit{ir}$relevant. Bell-inequality-violating quantum phenomena are thus arguably $\textit{not}$ in tension with relativity, locality, "statistical independence", nor with a supposed "realism". What they instead show is that history is, in a sense, $\textit{relevant}$.

Abstract:Relativistic theory and experiments teach us that causal influences are constrained by the speed of light. Deterministic theories incorporate this lesson in $\textit{functional}$ terms: whether an event occurs or not is functionally determined by events that occur in its immediate causal past. In this paper we suggest a natural generalization of this constraint that applies to probabilistic theories: the $\textit{probability}$ that an event occurs is to be functionally determined by the $\textit{probability}$ of the event-occurrences in its immediate causal past. This constraint differs from Bell's criterion of local causality and turns out to imply it only under an additional assumption that requires history to be, in a sense, $\textit{ir}$relevant. Bell-inequality-violating quantum phenomena are thus arguably $\textit{not}$ in tension with relativity, locality, "statistical independence", nor with a supposed "realism". What they instead show is that history is, in a sense, $\textit{relevant}$.

Quantum Physics (quant-ph); History and Philosophy of Physics (physics.hist-ph)

arXiv:2610.41944 [quant-ph]

(or arXiv:2610.41944v1 [quant-ph] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.41944 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 240 words

Related coverage