aiqbench analysis
This research establishes a fundamental tradeoff between the spatial locality of dissipation and the time required to prepare quantum many-body states, specifically within quadratic fermionic systems. By analyzing critical versus gapped regimes in models like the Kitaev chain, the study quantifies how local control constraints inevitably slow down preparation at criticality while allowing finite-time convergence in gapped phases. These findings provide essential theoretical bounds for designing scalable analog and digital quantum simulators that rely on open-system dynamics.
Locality-Preparation Time Tradeoffs in Dissipative Quantum Systems
arXiv:2610.13784v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Dissipative state preparation engineers quantum many-body states as steady states of an open-system dynamics. The spatial range of the required dissipation sets both the feasibility of analog implementations and the connectivity and control complexity of digital ones. Yet how this locality quantitatively constrains preparation times remains largely unknown. Here, we establish an exact locality-preparation time relation for quadratic fermionic systems and develop a construction that optimizes the locality of the dissipative dynamics while preserving the target state. Applied to the Kitaev chain, our framework reveals sharply different locality-preparation time tradeoffs in critical and gapped regimes. At criticality, suppressing the algebraic tails of the jump operators necessarily forces the preparation time to grow algebraically with system size. By contrast, both trivial and topological gapped phases admit exponentially localized dissipation with a finite preparation time in the thermodynamic limit. Our results identify when fast dissipative preparation is compatible with local control and when criticality imposes an unavoidable dynamical cost.
Abstract:Dissipative state preparation engineers quantum many-body states as steady states of an open-system dynamics. The spatial range of the required dissipation sets both the feasibility of analog implementations and the connectivity and control complexity of digital ones. Yet how this locality quantitatively constrains preparation times remains largely unknown. Here, we establish an exact locality-preparation time relation for quadratic fermionic systems and develop a construction that optimizes the locality of the dissipative dynamics while preserving the target state. Applied to the Kitaev chain, our framework reveals sharply different locality-preparation time tradeoffs in critical and gapped regimes. At criticality, suppressing the algebraic tails of the jump operators necessarily forces the preparation time to grow algebraically with system size. By contrast, both trivial and topological gapped phases admit exponentially localized dissipation with a finite preparation time in the thermodynamic limit. Our results identify when fast dissipative preparation is compatible with local control and when criticality imposes an unavoidable dynamical cost.
Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Statistical Mechanics (cond-mat.stat-mech)
arXiv:2610.13784 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2610.13784v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.13784 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 254 words
Related coverage

Moiré Heterostructures Achieve Superconductivity Without Attraction
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 19, 2026
Lattice Lindbladian simulation by patching and merging
arXiv · Sep 23, 2026

Researchers Propose a Dissipative Protocol for Preparing Laughlin-Like Quantum States
Quantum Zeitgeist · Jul 15, 2026

Gibbs state preparation for commuting Hamiltonian: Mapping to classical Gibbs sampling
Quantum Journal · Sep 18, 2026