aiqbench analysis
This study provides a negative answer to the question of whether local regularization fully characterizes multiclass PAC learnability, demonstrating specific classes where this principle fails despite low Daniely-Shalev-Shwartz dimensions. By analyzing hypotheses defined as edges in complete graphs and tournament instances, the authors reveal how cyclic structures can induce constant population errors even with arbitrarily large sample sizes. The findings refine theoretical boundaries for learning algorithms that rely on test-point-dependent scoring mechanisms to ensure consistency across multiclass problems.
Local Regularization Does Not Characterize Multiclass PAC Learnability
arXiv:2607.23449v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Local regularization assigns each hypothesis a test-point-dependent score and predicts with a minimum-score hypothesis consistent with the sample. Asilis et al. asked whether this principle characterizes multiclass PAC learnability. We give a negative answer. There is a countable class of Daniely--Shalev-Shwartz dimension at most two with realizable PAC sample complexity \[ O\!\left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon}\log\frac{1}{\delta}\right), \] that no local regularizer learns. Hypotheses are edges of complete graphs and instances are tournaments. At a test tournament, the scores fix an edge ranking while the training sample independently removes competitors. Cyclic triangles force enough inversions that surviving competitors produce constant population error at arbitrarily large sample sizes.
Abstract:Local regularization assigns each hypothesis a test-point-dependent score and predicts with a minimum-score hypothesis consistent with the sample. Asilis et al. asked whether this principle characterizes multiclass PAC learnability. We give a negative answer. There is a countable class of Daniely--Shalev-Shwartz dimension at most two with realizable PAC sample complexity \[ O\!\left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon}\log\frac{1}{\delta}\right), \] that no local regularizer learns. Hypotheses are edges of complete graphs and instances are tournaments. At a test tournament, the scores fix an edge ranking while the training sample independently removes competitors. Cyclic triangles force enough inversions that surviving competitors produce constant population error at arbitrarily large sample sizes.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2607.23449 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2607.23449v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.23449 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 196 words
Related coverage
Algorithmic Principles For Multiclass Learning Are Hard To Come By: Limits of Regularization and Proper Learning
arXiv · Aug 28, 2026
Large Classification-Risk-Optional Label Acquisition
arXiv · Sep 9, 2026
FreKoo++: Learning Continuous Spectral Dynamics for Temporal Domain Generalization
arXiv · Aug 25, 2026

The Entangled Dimensions of Decision Theory
LessWrong · Jul 30, 2026