Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This paper presents the first empirical comparison of pre-trained language models for spell correction, demonstrating that even small architectures like Gemma 3 can outperform rule-based systems with minimal fine-tuning data. The study provides critical insights into building effective NLP tools for low-resource languages, offering a practical pathway for deploying AI solutions where data is scarce.
Sources coveringarXiv, LessWrong
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

LMSpell: Spell Correction with Pre-Trained Language Models

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2512.05414v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Spell correction is still a challenging problem for many languages, especially low-resource languages (LRLs). While pre-trained language models (PLMs) have been employed for spell correction, there has been no proper comparison across PLMs. We present the first empirical study on the effectiveness of the three types of PLMs for spell correction across multiple languages, including low-resource languages. We show that even relatively small PLMs such as the 270M-parameter Gemma 3 and mBART50, when fine-tuned on a dataset of only 5k sentences, can outperform rule-based spell correctors, highlighting a practical pathway for building effective spell correction systems with limited data. We also present a case study with Sinhala to shed light on the plight of spell correction for LRLs.

Abstract:Spell correction is still a challenging problem for many languages, especially low-resource languages (LRLs). While pre-trained language models (PLMs) have been employed for spell correction, there has been no proper comparison across PLMs. We present the first empirical study on the effectiveness of the three types of PLMs for spell correction across multiple languages, including low-resource languages. We show that even relatively small PLMs such as the 270M-parameter Gemma 3 and mBART50, when fine-tuned on a dataset of only 5k sentences, can outperform rule-based spell correctors, highlighting a practical pathway for building effective spell correction systems with limited data. We also present a case study with Sinhala to shed light on the plight of spell correction for LRLs.

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2512.05414 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2512.05414v4 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.05414 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

https://doi.org/10.1109/MERCon71835.2026.11691371 Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 221 words

Related coverage