aiqbench analysis
This study demonstrates that Large Language Models can effectively screen for chronic kidney disease using zero-shot and few-shot learning, offering a viable solution when labeled medical data is scarce. While LLMs provide high data efficiency in low-resource scenarios, the research highlights a critical trade-off regarding model stability compared to traditional machine learning approaches as input complexity grows. These findings suggest that LLMs are best positioned as a flexible complement to established ML/DL methods rather than a complete replacement for them in clinical settings.
LLM4CKD: Large Language Models for Early Stage Chronic Kidney Disease Screening
arXiv:2609.04013v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Early screening of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is critical for timely intervention, yet most machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) approaches require labeled data and model training, limiting their use in real-world screening settings. This study evaluates the effectiveness of large language models (LLMs) for CKD screening under zero-shot and few-shot in-context learning settings and compares them with traditional ML and DL methods. We propose a framework that uses clinically selected tabular features and structured prompt templates to enable LLM-based inference without task-specific training. LLM performance is evaluated across multiple prompt styles, feature configurations, and data settings, and compared with standard ML, DL, and tabular foundation model (TFM) baselines, and existing CKD screening tools. The results show that LLMs can achieve competitive performance using only a small number of examples, often matching or outperforming traditional approaches in low-data settings. However, their performance remains model-dependent and less stable as input complexity increases. In contrast, ML, DL, and TFM models show more consistent improvement with larger training data. Overall, the findings highlight a trade-off between data efficiency and stability, suggesting that LLMs may serve as a flexible complementary approach for CKD screening when labeled data are limited.
Abstract:Early screening of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is critical for timely intervention, yet most machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) approaches require labeled data and model training, limiting their use in real-world screening settings. This study evaluates the effectiveness of large language models (LLMs) for CKD screening under zero-shot and few-shot in-context learning settings and compares them with traditional ML and DL methods. We propose a framework that uses clinically selected tabular features and structured prompt templates to enable LLM-based inference without task-specific training. LLM performance is evaluated across multiple prompt styles, feature configurations, and data settings, and compared with standard ML, DL, and tabular foundation model (TFM) baselines, and existing CKD screening tools. The results show that LLMs can achieve competitive performance using only a small number of examples, often matching or outperforming traditional approaches in low-data settings. However, their performance remains model-dependent and less stable as input complexity increases. In contrast, ML, DL, and TFM models show more consistent improvement with larger training data. Overall, the findings highlight a trade-off between data efficiency and stability, suggesting that LLMs may serve as a flexible complementary approach for CKD screening when labeled data are limited.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2609.04013 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2609.04013v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.04013 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 293 words
Related coverage

Forbes Asia 100 To Watch 2026
forbes.com · Aug 24, 2026

XtalPi Holdings Limited: XtalPi Holdings Announces 2026 Interim Results
finanznachrichten.de · Aug 19, 2026

AI in healthcare: applications and best practices
Databricks · Jul 24, 2026
Models Can't Remember Their Training. Neither Can You.
LessWrong · Jul 19, 2026