aiqbench analysis
This research introduces an LLM-guided framework that leverages offline semantic construction to enhance industrial time-series forecasting without incurring significant online inference overhead. By integrating process document semantics into numerical windows, the method achieves measurable accuracy improvements across various backbones while maintaining lightweight deployment characteristics.
LLM-Guided Task-Semantic Field Factorization for Industrial Process Forecasting
arXiv:2607.06623v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Process industries rely on time-series forecasting and soft sensing to estimate quality variables that are hard to measure online. Labeled data are scarce, operating regimes change frequently, and retraining models or rebuilding alignment pipelines for each scenario is costly. Such settings often provide variable tables and process documents that record variable names, units, physical meanings, and process roles. However, standard time-series backbones usually treat inputs as anonymous numerical columns. Existing text-enhanced methods also rarely make the semantic-logical relations between input variables and the prediction target available to the model within each numerical window. To address this problem, this article proposes Task-Semantic Field Factorization (TSF), a large language model (LLM)-guided framework. TSF builds a task-semantic field from task protocols and variable documents before training and uses the LLM only for offline semantic construction. Online training and inference are handled by conventional time-series backbones. During training and inference, the current numerical window activates variable semantics, so semantic information participates in each prediction and supports adaptation to different prediction targets and operating shifts. Across multiple complex industrial forecasting and delayed soft-sensing tasks, TSF reduces MAE by 3.6\% on average. Across all dataset--backbone pairs, the macro-average reduction is 2.9\%, with a maximum reduction of 24.9\%. It adds only about 0.7--4.3k parameters, with less than 8\,$\mu$s/sample of additional online inference overhead. These results show that TSF turns existing process documents into measurable forecasting gains across backbones and semantic generators while remaining lightweight for deployment.
Abstract:Process industries rely on time-series forecasting and soft sensing to estimate quality variables that are hard to measure online. Labeled data are scarce, operating regimes change frequently, and retraining models or rebuilding alignment pipelines for each scenario is costly. Such settings often provide variable tables and process documents that record variable names, units, physical meanings, and process roles. However, standard time-series backbones usually treat inputs as anonymous numerical columns. Existing text-enhanced methods also rarely make the semantic-logical relations between input variables and the prediction target available to the model within each numerical window. To address this problem, this article proposes Task-Semantic Field Factorization (TSF), a large language model (LLM)-guided framework. TSF builds a task-semantic field from task protocols and variable documents before training and uses the LLM only for offline semantic construction. Online training and inference are handled by conventional time-series backbones. During training and inference, the current numerical window activates variable semantics, so semantic information participates in each prediction and supports adaptation to different prediction targets and operating shifts. Across multiple complex industrial forecasting and delayed soft-sensing tasks, TSF reduces MAE by 3.6\% on average. Across all dataset--backbone pairs, the macro-average reduction is 2.9\%, with a maximum reduction of 24.9\%. It adds only about 0.7--4.3k parameters, with less than 8\,$\mu$s/sample of additional online inference overhead. These results show that TSF turns existing process documents into measurable forecasting gains across backbones and semantic generators while remaining lightweight for deployment.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Systems and Control (eess.SY)
arXiv:2607.06623 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2607.06623v2 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.06623 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 338 words
Related coverage
Links #5: 2026/07
LessWrong · Jul 31, 2026
Salesforce after Dreamforce: How the CRM giant can grow beyond its own interface
SiliconANGLE · Sep 19, 2026

Microsoft’s AI chief says superintelligence is near, but won’t take your job
The Verge · Jun 8, 2026

Post-Quantum Cryptography Explained, the Complete Plain English Guide
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 30, 2026