aiqbench analysis
This survey establishes a critical taxonomy for integrating Large Language Models into the system-level coordination of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) dispatch, moving beyond isolated optimization to semantic orchestration. It analyzes four distinct paradigms and identifies key challenges such as latency-aware reasoning, grounding reliability, and safety verification in physical execution environments. The work is essential for researchers developing robust, agentic systems where LLMs serve as a cross-layer interface between human intent and distributed control modules.
LLM-Enabled UAV Dispatch: A System-Level Survey and Taxonomy
arXiv:2610.09466v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) dispatch is beginning to move beyond isolated path planning and optimization-driven resource allocation toward system-level coordination supported by semantic reasoning and LLM-based interfaces. This survey provides a unified characterization of LLM-enabled UAV dispatch systems that bridges semantic intent, symbolic decision-making, and physical UAV execution. Rather than treating LLMs as standalone add-ons, we conceptualize them as a cross-layer semantic orchestration layer connecting human instructions, external solvers, and distributed control modules. We organize the literature into four representative dispatch paradigms: pipeline dispatch, global assignment dispatch, decentralized agentic dispatch, and divide-and-conquer dispatch. For each paradigm, we analyze its decision logic, system structure, control flow, representative methods, and potential LLM roles. We further examine how LLMs support semantic parsing, retrieval-grounded planning, solver orchestration, local agent reasoning, multi-agent coordination, safety assessment, and human-facing explanation. We discuss the implications of these paradigms for scalability, robustness, coordination burden, and verification requirements, and identify open challenges including latency-aware reasoning, grounding reliability, physical feasibility guarantees, edge deployment, privacy protection, and distributed consistency. This survey provides a system-level taxonomy and design perspective for integrating LLMs into safety-critical UAV dispatch systems.
Abstract:Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) dispatch is beginning to move beyond isolated path planning and optimization-driven resource allocation toward system-level coordination supported by semantic reasoning and LLM-based interfaces. This survey provides a unified characterization of LLM-enabled UAV dispatch systems that bridges semantic intent, symbolic decision-making, and physical UAV execution. Rather than treating LLMs as standalone add-ons, we conceptualize them as a cross-layer semantic orchestration layer connecting human instructions, external solvers, and distributed control modules. We organize the literature into four representative dispatch paradigms: pipeline dispatch, global assignment dispatch, decentralized agentic dispatch, and divide-and-conquer dispatch. For each paradigm, we analyze its decision logic, system structure, control flow, representative methods, and potential LLM roles. We further examine how LLMs support semantic parsing, retrieval-grounded planning, solver orchestration, local agent reasoning, multi-agent coordination, safety assessment, and human-facing explanation. We discuss the implications of these paradigms for scalability, robustness, coordination burden, and verification requirements, and identify open challenges including latency-aware reasoning, grounding reliability, physical feasibility guarantees, edge deployment, privacy protection, and distributed consistency. This survey provides a system-level taxonomy and design perspective for integrating LLMs into safety-critical UAV dispatch systems.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Systems and Control (eess.SY)
arXiv:2610.09466 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2610.09466v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.09466 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 282 words
Related coverage

Digital States 2026: AI Moves From Experiment to Infrastructure
govtech.com · Sep 24, 2026
Thread Trace Part 1: ROCprof Compute Viewer
AMD · Sep 15, 2026

Research Note: Filtering Subversion-Relevant Information From Pretraining Data Is Feasible
LessWrong · Oct 5, 2026
Model Context Protocols in Adaptive Transport Systems: A Survey
arXiv · Jun 8, 2026