aiqbench analysis
This study empirically evaluates whether Large Language Models offer superior sentiment signals for predicting tail-risk events in meme stocks compared to traditional lexicon-based methods. While LLMs provide richer multidimensional representations of social media discourse, the findings suggest that increased linguistic expressiveness does not guarantee stable forecasting performance across volatile retail-driven markets. The research highlights critical limitations in applying advanced NLP techniques directly to high-frequency financial volatility without asset-specific calibration.
LLM-Based vs. Lexicon-Based Sentiment Signals for Tail-Risk Detection in Meme Stocks
arXiv:2607.24072v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: This paper presents an empirical comparison of lexicon-based and Large Language Model (LLM)-based sentiment analysis for extracting market-relevant signals from social media discourse in highly volatile equity markets. Using Reddit data from r/WallStreetBets and focusing on meme stocks (GME, AMC, NOK), we construct time-aligned sentiment indicators and evaluate their relationship with market returns, with particular attention to extreme positive return events in the upper tail of the return distribution. The LLM-based approach generates multidimensional sentiment representations capturing emotional polarity, bullishness, sarcasm likelihood, and topical relevance, whereas the baseline relies on the VADER lexicon-based model. We evaluate both approaches using lead/lag correlation analysis, OLS regression, ROC-AUC-based directional classification, and a quantile-based early-warning framework. The results indicate that LLM-derived indicators provide a richer multidimensional representation and exhibit stronger asset-specific statistical structure than the lexicon-based baseline. However, their relationship with market movements remains heterogeneous across assets, suggesting that increased linguistic expressiveness does not necessarily translate into stable forecasting performance in retail-driven volatility regimes.
Title:LLM-Based vs. Lexicon-Based Sentiment Signals for Tail-Risk Detection in Meme Stocks
Abstract:This paper presents an empirical comparison of lexicon-based and Large Language Model (LLM)-based sentiment analysis for extracting market-relevant signals from social media discourse in highly volatile equity markets. Using Reddit data from r/WallStreetBets and focusing on meme stocks (GME, AMC, NOK), we construct time-aligned sentiment indicators and evaluate their relationship with market returns, with particular attention to extreme positive return events in the upper tail of the return distribution. The LLM-based approach generates multidimensional sentiment representations capturing emotional polarity, bullishness, sarcasm likelihood, and topical relevance, whereas the baseline relies on the VADER lexicon-based model. We evaluate both approaches using lead/lag correlation analysis, OLS regression, ROC-AUC-based directional classification, and a quantile-based early-warning framework. The results indicate that LLM-derived indicators provide a richer multidimensional representation and exhibit stronger asset-specific statistical structure than the lexicon-based baseline. However, their relationship with market movements remains heterogeneous across assets, suggesting that increased linguistic expressiveness does not necessarily translate into stable forecasting performance in retail-driven volatility regimes.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2607.24072 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2607.24072v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.24072 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 266 words
Related coverage
[AINews] High Taste Testers Ep. 1
Latent Space · Oct 17, 2026

NVIDIA speeds up financial clustering with GPU factorization
Quantum Zeitgeist · Sep 5, 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Oct 3, 2026

AI customer service: strategy, agents, and solutions guide
Databricks · Jul 27, 2026