aiqbench analysis
This paper demonstrates an LLM-driven architecture for automating regulatory compliance checks in corporate lending, shifting from manual review to a two-step process of rule extraction and application evaluation. The system effectively identifies policy exceptions and previously overlooked risks, though it acknowledges the necessity of human oversight due to false positives. This work highlights a practical application of large language models in high-stakes financial operations where interpretability and adherence to internal policies are critical.
LLM-Based Policy Compliance Verification of Loan Applications
arXiv:2610.20155v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Banks rely on extensive internal policy frameworks to ensure that corporate lending decisions comply with regulatory requirements and internal risk standards. Reviewing loan applications against these policies is a largely manual and knowledge-intensive process, which can lead to overlooked policy violations or exceptions. This report presents a prototype of an LLM-based policy checker that automatically verifies loan applications against internal lending policies. The proposed approach follows a two-step architecture. First, compliance-relevant rules are automatically extracted from policy documents and converted into structured, machine-readable representations. Second, loan applications are evaluated against the extracted rules to identify policy exceptions, non-compliant findings, missing information, and cases requiring manual review. Evaluation results demonstrate that the rule extraction process is highly stable across multiple runs and consistently captures rules identified as critical by a domain expert. When evaluated on 11 real loan applications with known policy exceptions, the system successfully detected the majority of these exceptions and identified additional compliance issues that had previously been overlooked during manual reviews. While the approach produces false positives and cannot fully replace human judgement, the results indicate that LLM-based policy compliance verification can provide valuable support in the loan application verification process by highlighting potential compliance risks.
Abstract:Banks rely on extensive internal policy frameworks to ensure that corporate lending decisions comply with regulatory requirements and internal risk standards. Reviewing loan applications against these policies is a largely manual and knowledge-intensive process, which can lead to overlooked policy violations or exceptions. This report presents a prototype of an LLM-based policy checker that automatically verifies loan applications against internal lending policies. The proposed approach follows a two-step architecture. First, compliance-relevant rules are automatically extracted from policy documents and converted into structured, machine-readable representations. Second, loan applications are evaluated against the extracted rules to identify policy exceptions, non-compliant findings, missing information, and cases requiring manual review. Evaluation results demonstrate that the rule extraction process is highly stable across multiple runs and consistently captures rules identified as critical by a domain expert. When evaluated on 11 real loan applications with known policy exceptions, the system successfully detected the majority of these exceptions and identified additional compliance issues that had previously been overlooked during manual reviews. While the approach produces false positives and cannot fully replace human judgement, the results indicate that LLM-based policy compliance verification can provide valuable support in the loan application verification process by highlighting potential compliance risks.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2610.20155 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2610.20155v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.20155 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 297 words
Related coverage

Build durable agents with Temporal and Lakebase
Databricks · Sep 8, 2026

Implementing defense-in-depth authorization for MCP tools on Amazon Quick
AWS · Sep 17, 2026
A Red Line and Oversight Framework for Government AI Contracts
AI Alignment Forum · Jul 18, 2026

Top 10 Best Network Security Policy Management Tools in 2026
Cybersecurity News · Sep 7, 2026