aiqbench analysis
This research introduces REP-HO, an LLM-driven evaluation planner that replaces heuristic rules with reasoning-based decision-making for heterogeneous multi-objective optimization problems. By leveraging large language models to adaptively allocate resources across varying costs and fidelities, the method achieves competitive performance and stability comparable to state-of-the-art human-designed metrics. The study demonstrates that LLMs can effectively serve as flexible planners in complex optimization regimes where traditional fixed rules struggle.
LLM-Based Evaluation Planning for Heterogeneous Optimization
arXiv:2610.24855v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Heterogeneous optimization problems require an optimizer to decide not only which candidate solutions to evaluate, but also which objectives and constraints should be evaluated under different costs and fidelities. Existing SOTA methods such as MFE-NSGA-III address this setting with manually designed selection metrics, but their behavior is largely determined by predefined heuristic rules and hyperparameters. In this work, we propose REP-HO, a reasoning-based evaluation planner that replaces the rule-based mixed-fidelity selection step with a large language model (LLM) planner. The LLM receives the same primitive optimization-state information as the heuristic planner, such as surrogate predictions, uncertainties, evaluation costs, and budget status. We first show that REP-HO achieves competitive performance compared to the human-designed metric-based method (MFE-NSGA-III). We then further enhance each decision with an adaptive nearest-neighbor summary, leading to better and more stable results. We evaluate REP-HO across five heterogeneous regimes covering cost imbalance, constraint difficulty, surrogate fidelity, budget level, and objective conflict. Across these regimes, one of the two variants obtains the best mean ranking score in every regime, REP-HO(Deepseek) is first or second throughout, and the planner shows adaptive allocation behavior, such as prioritizing constraint evaluations under tighter budgets and reallocating constraint evaluation budget when surrogate reliability changes. These results suggest that LLMs can serve as flexible evaluation planners for heterogeneous optimization, offering a general alternative to fixed hand-designed metrics.
Abstract:Heterogeneous optimization problems require an optimizer to decide not only which candidate solutions to evaluate, but also which objectives and constraints should be evaluated under different costs and fidelities. Existing SOTA methods such as MFE-NSGA-III address this setting with manually designed selection metrics, but their behavior is largely determined by predefined heuristic rules and hyperparameters. In this work, we propose REP-HO, a reasoning-based evaluation planner that replaces the rule-based mixed-fidelity selection step with a large language model (LLM) planner. The LLM receives the same primitive optimization-state information as the heuristic planner, such as surrogate predictions, uncertainties, evaluation costs, and budget status. We first show that REP-HO achieves competitive performance compared to the human-designed metric-based method (MFE-NSGA-III). We then further enhance each decision with an adaptive nearest-neighbor summary, leading to better and more stable results. We evaluate REP-HO across five heterogeneous regimes covering cost imbalance, constraint difficulty, surrogate fidelity, budget level, and objective conflict. Across these regimes, one of the two variants obtains the best mean ranking score in every regime, REP-HO(Deepseek) is first or second throughout, and the planner shows adaptive allocation behavior, such as prioritizing constraint evaluations under tighter budgets and reallocating constraint evaluation budget when surrogate reliability changes. These results suggest that LLMs can serve as flexible evaluation planners for heterogeneous optimization, offering a general alternative to fixed hand-designed metrics.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2610.24855 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2610.24855v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.24855 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 314 words
Related coverage
HERO: Hierarchical Evidential Reasoning Optimization for Radiology Report Generation via Reason-then-Summarize
arXiv · Aug 5, 2026
Towards Serverless Semi-Decentralized Federated Learning with Heterogeneous Optimizers
arXiv · Jun 8, 2026
Heteroskedastic Signals in Budgeted LLM Verification: Structural Heterogeneity Limits Optimization Gains
arXiv · Jun 16, 2026
A Temporal Planning Framework for Disruption Aware Dynamic Route Optimization in Heterogeneous Railway Systems
arXiv · Jun 15, 2026