Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This survey provides a critical taxonomy for LLM-based agents applied specifically to time-series data, moving beyond isolated technical components to organize systems by their core forecasting, anomaly detection, and decision support tasks. By analyzing how task requirements dictate agent architecture, tool usage, and memory design, the paper identifies significant gaps in current research that will guide future development in temporal AI applications.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

LLM Agents for Time-Series: A Survey

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2608.26226v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM-based agents are increasingly being developed for time-series problems, but their design choices vary substantially across task settings. This survey adopts a problem-driven taxonomy that organizes these systems by the time-series problems they address rather than by isolated technical components. We group existing systems into four categories: forecasting and reasoning, augmentation and synthesis, anomaly detection and diagnosis, and decision support. Within each category, we examine how task requirements shape agent architecture, tool use, and memory design. We further summarize representative datasets and environments, and compare reported model performance under shared or closely related settings. Overall, this survey offers a task-oriented guide to designing LLM-based agents for time-series problems and identifies open gaps for future work.

Abstract:LLM-based agents are increasingly being developed for time-series problems, but their design choices vary substantially across task settings. This survey adopts a problem-driven taxonomy that organizes these systems by the time-series problems they address rather than by isolated technical components. We group existing systems into four categories: forecasting and reasoning, augmentation and synthesis, anomaly detection and diagnosis, and decision support. Within each category, we examine how task requirements shape agent architecture, tool use, and memory design. We further summarize representative datasets and environments, and compare reported model performance under shared or closely related settings. Overall, this survey offers a task-oriented guide to designing LLM-based agents for time-series problems and identifies open gaps for future work.

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2608.26226 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2608.26226v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.26226 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 209 words

Related coverage