aiqbench analysis
This research introduces LLaDA-PRM, a bidirectional step-level reasoning evaluator that leverages full solution context to improve the accuracy of validating earlier reasoning steps compared to standard causal models. By utilizing bidirectional attention mechanisms, the 8B model achieves significant performance gains on mathematical benchmarks like MR-MATH-invalid and outperforms larger baselines while remaining effective for incomplete traces. The study further demonstrates its utility as a training-data selection signal that enhances the mathematical capabilities of base models like Mistral-7B.
LLaDA-PRM: A Bidirectional Step-Level Reasoning Evaluator
arXiv:2609.22700v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Step-level reasoning evaluators are commonly based on autoregressive language models, whose causal attention restricts each step representation to the problem, previous steps, and the current step. Yet, when the complete solution is available, the validity of an earlier step may become clearer only through its downstream consequences. We validate this hypothesis through a controlled 54-run comparison of causal and bidirectional LLaDA evaluators at 1B--3B scale, changing only the self-attention mask, and find bidirectional attention yields consistent improvements. Building on this finding, we introduce \prm{}, an 8B bidirectional evaluator that reaches 88.8 step-level F1 on MR-MATH-invalid and 83.8 on the out-of-distribution MR-GSM8K original-question subset, outperforming ReasonEval-Llemma-34B by 11.3 and 10.3 F1 points, respectively. \prm{} also remains effective when evaluating incomplete reasoning traces in online settings, outperforming the strongest baselines on both benchmarks by a large margin. We further show that \prm{} provides an effective training-data selection signal, improving Mistral-7B performance on MATH-500.
Abstract:Step-level reasoning evaluators are commonly based on autoregressive language models, whose causal attention restricts each step representation to the problem, previous steps, and the current step. Yet, when the complete solution is available, the validity of an earlier step may become clearer only through its downstream consequences. We validate this hypothesis through a controlled 54-run comparison of causal and bidirectional LLaDA evaluators at 1B--3B scale, changing only the self-attention mask, and find bidirectional attention yields consistent improvements. Building on this finding, we introduce \prm{}, an 8B bidirectional evaluator that reaches 88.8 step-level F1 on MR-MATH-invalid and 83.8 on the out-of-distribution MR-GSM8K original-question subset, outperforming ReasonEval-Llemma-34B by 11.3 and 10.3 F1 points, respectively. \prm{} also remains effective when evaluating incomplete reasoning traces in online settings, outperforming the strongest baselines on both benchmarks by a large margin. We further show that \prm{} provides an effective training-data selection signal, improving Mistral-7B performance on MATH-500.
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2609.22700 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2609.22700v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.22700 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 249 words
Related coverage

Runway’s WorldPrompt and the Engineering of Real-Time Worlds
Latent Space · Sep 25, 2026
Test-Time Scaling with Diffusion Language Models via Reward-Guided Stitching
arXiv · Oct 10, 2026

An Organizational Second Brain: Building an AI That Learns From Experts
Meta Engineering · Sep 2, 2026

Astra uses some of its no-CoT capability in practice
LessWrong · Sep 17, 2026