aiqbench analysis
Literati introduces an AO*-based algorithm that guarantees optimal induction for Shape Generalized Trees, overcoming the suboptimal structures and lack of expressivity inherent in greedy methods. By jointly optimizing tree topology and learnable shape functions, this approach achieves superior accuracy on tabular data while maintaining interpretability. The method represents a significant advancement in decision tree theory by resolving the trade-off between structural complexity and global optimality.
Literati: Towards Anytime Optimal Shape Generalized Trees via AO*
arXiv:2609.09299v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Decision trees are prized for their interpretability and strong performance on tabular data, but popular greedy top-down induction algorithms can yield suboptimal and unnecessarily complex structures. Optimal decision tree methods address this through global optimization, yet remain restricted to axis-aligned threshold splits, which limit the expressivity of each node and often force deep, complex trees to capture non-linear feature effects. Shape Generalized Trees (SGTs) generalize threshold splits to learnable univariate shape functions, improving expressivity and enabling more compact trees. However, existing SGT induction algorithms are greedy and offer no optimality guarantees. In this work, we introduce Literati, the first algorithm for optimal SGT induction. We propose a novel AND/OR graph formulation of the problem that jointly optimizes tree structure and shape function complexity. To solve this AND/OR graph, we develop an AO*-based algorithm with two enhancements that improve anytime performance while preserving optimality: a secondary heuristic for OR-node selection and a round-robin policy for AND-node exploration. Across 24 real-world datasets, Literati achieves higher training and test accuracy than state-of-the-art tree approaches.
Abstract:Decision trees are prized for their interpretability and strong performance on tabular data, but popular greedy top-down induction algorithms can yield suboptimal and unnecessarily complex structures. Optimal decision tree methods address this through global optimization, yet remain restricted to axis-aligned threshold splits, which limit the expressivity of each node and often force deep, complex trees to capture non-linear feature effects. Shape Generalized Trees (SGTs) generalize threshold splits to learnable univariate shape functions, improving expressivity and enabling more compact trees. However, existing SGT induction algorithms are greedy and offer no optimality guarantees. In this work, we introduce Literati, the first algorithm for optimal SGT induction. We propose a novel AND/OR graph formulation of the problem that jointly optimizes tree structure and shape function complexity. To solve this AND/OR graph, we develop an AO*-based algorithm with two enhancements that improve anytime performance while preserving optimality: a secondary heuristic for OR-node selection and a round-robin policy for AND-node exploration. Across 24 real-world datasets, Literati achieves higher training and test accuracy than state-of-the-art tree approaches.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2609.09299 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.09299v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.09299 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 265 words
Related coverage
Performance Profiling on AMD GPUs – Part 5: Profiling-Driven Kernel Optimization with an AI Code-Assist Tool
AMD · Jul 16, 2026

Opaque recurrence, and other AI terms that you should probably know
TechCrunch · Sep 7, 2026

The Entangled Dimensions of Decision Theory
LessWrong · Jul 30, 2026
Coverage-driven alignment - What ‘Teaching Claude Why’ can borrow from AV verification
LessWrong · Jun 8, 2026