Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This study critically evaluates Chain-of-Thought prompting in Speech-to-Text Translation, revealing that current models largely ignore acoustic cues and rely on text transcripts rather than truly "listening." The research demonstrates that specific training interventions can significantly improve robustness and force architectures to explicitly integrate speech information. These findings are vital for advancing multimodal AI systems where audio fidelity is central to performance.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Listening or Reading? Evaluating Speech Awareness in Chain-of-Thought Speech-to-Text Translation

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2510.03115v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Speech-to-Text Translation (S2TT) systems built from Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) and Text-to-Text Translation (T2TT) modules face two major limitations: error propagation and the inability to exploit prosodic or other acoustic cues. Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting has recently been introduced, with the expectation that jointly accessing speech and transcription will overcome these issues. Analyzing CoT through attribution methods, robustness evaluations with corrupted transcripts, and prosody-awareness, we find that it largely mirrors cascaded behavior, relying mainly on transcripts while barely leveraging speech. Simple training interventions, such as adding Direct S2TT data or noisy transcript injection, enhance robustness and increase speech attribution. These findings challenge the assumed advantages of CoT and highlight the need for architectures that explicitly integrate acoustic information into translation.

Title:Listening or Reading? Evaluating Speech Awareness in Chain-of-Thought Speech-to-Text Translation

Abstract:Speech-to-Text Translation (S2TT) systems built from Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) and Text-to-Text Translation (T2TT) modules face two major limitations: error propagation and the inability to exploit prosodic or other acoustic cues. Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting has recently been introduced, with the expectation that jointly accessing speech and transcription will overcome these issues. Analyzing CoT through attribution methods, robustness evaluations with corrupted transcripts, and prosody-awareness, we find that it largely mirrors cascaded behavior, relying mainly on transcripts while barely leveraging speech. Simple training interventions, such as adding Direct S2TT data or noisy transcript injection, enhance robustness and increase speech attribution. These findings challenge the assumed advantages of CoT and highlight the need for architectures that explicitly integrate acoustic information into translation.

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Sound (cs.SD)

arXiv:2510.03115 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2510.03115v2 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.03115 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 224 words

Related coverage