aiqbench analysis
This research identifies a critical bias in automatic speech recognition systems where speakers whose first languages are linguistically distant from English face systematically higher error rates. The study further reveals that these performance disparities manifest as distinct spatial segregation within the model's latent representations across deeper acoustic layers. Addressing this fundamental architectural limitation is essential for developing equitable and robust ASR technologies for global populations.
Linguistic Distance Segregates Latent Representations in Automatic Speech Recognition Systems
arXiv:2608.30853v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: While automatic speech recognition (ASR) models have achieved remarkable improvements in recent years, performance disparities persist across different speaker populations. One such disparity is for speakers whose first languages (L1) are from families distant from English. This paper investigates the relationship between first language background and English ASR performance. Through empirical analysis, we observe that the correlation between speakers' L1 distance and ASR error rates yields a systematic effect on English Speech, with its strength varying across datasets and models. This association is statistically significant in a follow-up analysis accounting for dataset-level variation in Tweedie mixed-effects models ($p<0.001$ across evaluated models). In addition, analysis of the latent space reveals a L1-based spatial segregation across deeper acoustic layers in the majority of evaluated architectures
Abstract:While automatic speech recognition (ASR) models have achieved remarkable improvements in recent years, performance disparities persist across different speaker populations. One such disparity is for speakers whose first languages (L1) are from families distant from English. This paper investigates the relationship between first language background and English ASR performance. Through empirical analysis, we observe that the correlation between speakers' L1 distance and ASR error rates yields a systematic effect on English Speech, with its strength varying across datasets and models. This association is statistically significant in a follow-up analysis accounting for dataset-level variation in Tweedie mixed-effects models ($p<0.001$ across evaluated models). In addition, analysis of the latent space reveals a L1-based spatial segregation across deeper acoustic layers in the majority of evaluated architectures
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2608.30853 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2608.30853v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.30853 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 221 words
Related coverage
Proactive for Uncertainty: Cause-Aware Error Diagnosis and Interactive Clarification for Spoken Dialogue Systems
arXiv · Sep 25, 2026
Multi-task Learning is Not Enough: Representational Entanglement in Dual-output Second Language Speech Recognition
arXiv · Jun 8, 2026
Evaluating Bias in Phoneme-Based Automatic Speech Recognition Systems: An Analysis of IPA Transcription Models
arXiv · Jun 11, 2026
Multi-task Learning is Not Enough: Representational Entanglement in Dual-output Second Language Speech Recognition
arXiv · Jun 11, 2026