Skip to content
aiqbench takeQuantum Computing

aiqbench analysis

This study establishes design guidelines for generating high-fidelity photonic Bell states in integrated quantum circuits by evaluating five heralded schemes against realistic loss models. The analysis reveals a critical trade-off where higher-order multiphoton interference offers superior fidelity robustness in low-loss environments, whereas lower-photon-number approaches are more efficient when resource costs like probabilistic sources or beamsplitter losses dominate. These findings provide essential theoretical grounding for optimizing discrete-variable quantum photonics architectures used in communication and computing applications.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Limits of heralded photonic Bell-state generation in the presence of loss

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2608.01549v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: High-quality entangled states of photons underlie quantum information science (QIS) applications across communication, sensing, and computing. In many discrete-variable photonic QIS architectures, large application-ready states (e.g., cluster states, repeater graph states) are constructed via fusion measurements on small entangled seed states, of which Bell states are the fundamental example. The quality of seed-state generation therefore sets a baseline for application performance, making it crucial to understand this process under realistic error mechanisms, particularly in integrated photonics experiments. In this work, we analyze five heralded schemes for generating event-ready photonic Bell states, contrasting their heralding probabilities, fidelities, and error robustness. We develop a hierarchy of error models, progressing from an analytically tractable lumped-loss model to realistic heralded single-photon sources with multiphoton emission errors and finally to integrated frequency-bin implementations with architecture-dependent loss. Across these models, we find that schemes based on higher-order multiphoton interference provide superior fidelity robustness in low-loss implementations, while lower-photon-number schemes can be preferable when probabilistic sources or lossy beamsplitters dominate the resource cost. Our results provide design guidance for integrated discrete-variable quantum photonics, with particular relevance for frequency-bin architectures where active beamsplitter loss can determine the optimal resource-state-generation strategy.

Abstract:High-quality entangled states of photons underlie quantum information science (QIS) applications across communication, sensing, and computing. In many discrete-variable photonic QIS architectures, large application-ready states (e.g., cluster states, repeater graph states) are constructed via fusion measurements on small entangled seed states, of which Bell states are the fundamental example. The quality of seed-state generation therefore sets a baseline for application performance, making it crucial to understand this process under realistic error mechanisms, particularly in integrated photonics experiments. In this work, we analyze five heralded schemes for generating event-ready photonic Bell states, contrasting their heralding probabilities, fidelities, and error robustness. We develop a hierarchy of error models, progressing from an analytically tractable lumped-loss model to realistic heralded single-photon sources with multiphoton emission errors and finally to integrated frequency-bin implementations with architecture-dependent loss. Across these models, we find that schemes based on higher-order multiphoton interference provide superior fidelity robustness in low-loss implementations, while lower-photon-number schemes can be preferable when probabilistic sources or lossy beamsplitters dominate the resource cost. Our results provide design guidance for integrated discrete-variable quantum photonics, with particular relevance for frequency-bin architectures where active beamsplitter loss can determine the optimal resource-state-generation strategy.

Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Optics (physics.optics)

arXiv:2608.01549 [quant-ph]

(or arXiv:2608.01549v1 [quant-ph] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.01549 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 288 words

Related coverage