aiqbench analysis
This research introduces a neural-network-based normalizing flow technique that effectively isolates pivotal statistics even when nuisance parameters are present, leveraging only a sample generator from the target distribution. The method demonstrates superior power and speed compared to traditional profile likelihood-ratio techniques on small-to-moderate datasets while maintaining good calibration across various statistical tests. By incorporating prior knowledge of group invariances, this approach advances the intersection of machine learning and rigorous statistical inference.
Likelihood-free inference with nuisance parameters through normalizing flows
arXiv:2609.10534v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We present a simple decomposition of a neural-network-based normalizing flow that naturally uncovers a pivotal statistic (or something close) in the presence of nuisance parameters, based only on a sample generator from the distribution of interest. We show that the statistic is near-pivotal in the sense of minimum average KL-divergence of its $p$-values versus uniform and we argue that it can be expected to have good power when the dimension of the statistic equals the dimension of the parameter. It is able to incorporate prior knowledge about group invariances such as translation and scale. It can discover the one-sample $t$-test almost exactly, outperforms the Welch test in terms of worst-case size over a constrained variance-ratio range and achieves good calibration on partial biserial correlations, while showing higher power (and being much faster) on small-to-moderate samples than profile likelihood-ratio techniques.
Abstract:We present a simple decomposition of a neural-network-based normalizing flow that naturally uncovers a pivotal statistic (or something close) in the presence of nuisance parameters, based only on a sample generator from the distribution of interest. We show that the statistic is near-pivotal in the sense of minimum average KL-divergence of its $p$-values versus uniform and we argue that it can be expected to have good power when the dimension of the statistic equals the dimension of the parameter. It is able to incorporate prior knowledge about group invariances such as translation and scale. It can discover the one-sample $t$-test almost exactly, outperforms the Welch test in terms of worst-case size over a constrained variance-ratio range and achieves good calibration on partial biserial correlations, while showing higher power (and being much faster) on small-to-moderate samples than profile likelihood-ratio techniques.
49 pages and 13 figures, including appendices. Code available at this https URL
Methodology (stat.ME); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
arXiv:2609.10534 [stat.ME]
(or arXiv:2609.10534v1 [stat.ME] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.10534 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 251 words
Related coverage
Neural Galerkin Normalizing Flows for Bayesian Inference of Diffusions with Inaccessible Boundaries
arXiv · Jun 5, 2026
Simulation-Based Quantum System Inference with Neural Posterior Estimation
arXiv · Sep 30, 2026
Prior-Amortized In-Context Bayesian Inference for Generalized Linear Mixed-Effects Models
arXiv · Sep 22, 2026

Measurement incompatibility in Bayesian multiparameter quantum estimation
Quantum Journal · Aug 13, 2026