Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI + Quantum

aiqbench analysis

This paper applies neural network decoders and in situ calibration to readout on IBM superconducting processors, aiming to make mid-circuit measurements more reliable for error correction and feedback. Its theoretical claims concern Bayes risk limits and contraction of an overlap-based bound, while the experiments cover stabilizer, parity-check, and teleportation workloads. Readers should watch whether the gains hold across hardware and workloads beyond these three processors.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Lifting: Quantum State Discrimination Framework for Mid-Circuit Measurements

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.18482v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Quantum computing promises new capabilities beyond classical computation. Mid-circuit measurements (MCMs) enable error correction and outcome-dependent control, but their reliability is limited by noise on superconducting hardware. These operations depend on accurate quantum state discrimination (QSD), which assigns measured signals to state labels. Neural network-based (NN-based) QSD improves this assignment, yet its error remains bounded below by the Bayes risk of the available readout distributions. A complementary challenge is state deterioration as successive measurements accumulate and circuit execution advances, making static calibration less representative of the workload. We present Lifting, a QSD framework that addresses both challenges through repetition encoding, neural decoding, and in situ calibration. Encoding supplies joint in-phase and quadrature (I-Q) readout signals from the target and auxiliary qubits, while contextual calibration trains the decoder for the conditions encountered during execution. Our theoretical analysis shows that retaining additional channels from a fixed joint distribution cannot increase Bayes risk and establishes sufficient conditions for contraction of an overlap-based upper bound. Experiments across three IBM processors evaluate the framework on repeated stabilizer measurement, parity-check, and teleportation workloads.

Abstract:Quantum computing promises new capabilities beyond classical computation. Mid-circuit measurements (MCMs) enable error correction and outcome-dependent control, but their reliability is limited by noise on superconducting hardware. These operations depend on accurate quantum state discrimination (QSD), which assigns measured signals to state labels. Neural network-based (NN-based) QSD improves this assignment, yet its error remains bounded below by the Bayes risk of the available readout distributions. A complementary challenge is state deterioration as successive measurements accumulate and circuit execution advances, making static calibration less representative of the workload. We present Lifting, a QSD framework that addresses both challenges through repetition encoding, neural decoding, and in situ calibration. Encoding supplies joint in-phase and quadrature (I-Q) readout signals from the target and auxiliary qubits, while contextual calibration trains the decoder for the conditions encountered during execution. Our theoretical analysis shows that retaining additional channels from a fixed joint distribution cannot increase Bayes risk and establishes sufficient conditions for contraction of an overlap-based upper bound. Experiments across three IBM processors evaluate the framework on repeated stabilizer measurement, parity-check, and teleportation workloads.

Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Emerging Technologies (cs.ET); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2610.18482 [quant-ph]

(or arXiv:2610.18482v1 [quant-ph] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.18482 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 277 words

Related coverage