Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This study applies interpretable tree-based machine learning models to estimate local air pollutants using remote traffic data, demonstrating that such inputs can rival measurements from neighboring monitoring stations in high-traffic environments. By comparing performance across multiple London sites and validating against spatial interpolation methods, the research provides a rigorous assessment of how external data sources enhance predictive accuracy for NO₂ and other key pollutants.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Leveraging Remote Traffic Data for Local Air Pollutant Estimation: A Scenario-Based Machine Learning Study Across London Monitoring Sites

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2608.23219v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Vehicular traffic is a major source of air pollution; however, the contribution of remotely acquired traffic information to local machine-learning (ML) air-pollution models remains insufficiently characterised. This study evaluates four interpretable tree-based ML models (Random Forest, Extra Trees, LightGBM, and XGBoost) under six predictor scenarios combining progressively larger predictor sets, ranging from remotely acquired traffic, meteorological, and temporal variables alone to the inclusion of measurements from one and four neighbouring monitoring stations, to estimate NO$_2$, PM$_{10}$, PM$_{2.5}$, and O$_3$ concentrations across several sites in London. ML model performance was compared with a ridge linear regression model as a baseline, with spatial interpolation methods and with a cross-site validation experiment. When modelling without data from neighbouring stations, the RMSE for NO$_2$ ranged from 9.73 to 11.66 $\mu$g/m$^3$ without traffic information, compared with 8.72 to 11.52 $\mu$g/m$^3$ when traffic information was included. Additionally, for NO$_2$, SHAP analyses indicate that traffic-related variables can contribute at levels comparable to pollutant measurements from neighbouring monitoring stations in traffic-dominated~environments.

Abstract:Vehicular traffic is a major source of air pollution; however, the contribution of remotely acquired traffic information to local machine-learning (ML) air-pollution models remains insufficiently characterised. This study evaluates four interpretable tree-based ML models (Random Forest, Extra Trees, LightGBM, and XGBoost) under six predictor scenarios combining progressively larger predictor sets, ranging from remotely acquired traffic, meteorological, and temporal variables alone to the inclusion of measurements from one and four neighbouring monitoring stations, to estimate NO$_2$, PM$_{10}$, PM$_{2.5}$, and O$_3$ concentrations across several sites in London. ML model performance was compared with a ridge linear regression model as a baseline, with spatial interpolation methods and with a cross-site validation experiment. When modelling without data from neighbouring stations, the RMSE for NO$_2$ ranged from 9.73 to 11.66 $\mu$g/m$^3$ without traffic information, compared with 8.72 to 11.52 $\mu$g/m$^3$ when traffic information was included. Additionally, for NO$_2$, SHAP analyses indicate that traffic-related variables can contribute at levels comparable to pollutant measurements from neighbouring monitoring stations in traffic-dominated~environments.

Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2608.23219 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2608.23219v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.23219 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Correlation_Matrix_Camden-EustonRoad.png

Correlation_Matrix_CamdenKerbside.png

Correlation_Matrix_LondonMaryleboneRoad.png

Correlation_Matrix_Wandsworth-PutneyHighStreet.png

Correlation_Matrix_Westminster-OxfordStreet.png

OpenWeather_validation_temperature_wind.png

time_series_observed_ML_Ridge_NO2.png

time_series_observed_ML_Ridge_O3.png

time_series_observed_ML_Ridge_PM10.png

time_series_observed_ML_Ridge_PM25.png

(5 additional files not shown) You must enabled JavaScript to view entire file list.

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 281 words

Related coverage