aiqbench analysis
This study applies interpretable tree-based machine learning models to estimate local air pollutants using remote traffic data, demonstrating that such inputs can rival measurements from neighboring monitoring stations in high-traffic environments. By comparing performance across multiple London sites and validating against spatial interpolation methods, the research provides a rigorous assessment of how external data sources enhance predictive accuracy for NO₂ and other key pollutants.
Leveraging Remote Traffic Data for Local Air Pollutant Estimation: A Scenario-Based Machine Learning Study Across London Monitoring Sites
arXiv:2608.23219v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Vehicular traffic is a major source of air pollution; however, the contribution of remotely acquired traffic information to local machine-learning (ML) air-pollution models remains insufficiently characterised. This study evaluates four interpretable tree-based ML models (Random Forest, Extra Trees, LightGBM, and XGBoost) under six predictor scenarios combining progressively larger predictor sets, ranging from remotely acquired traffic, meteorological, and temporal variables alone to the inclusion of measurements from one and four neighbouring monitoring stations, to estimate NO$_2$, PM$_{10}$, PM$_{2.5}$, and O$_3$ concentrations across several sites in London. ML model performance was compared with a ridge linear regression model as a baseline, with spatial interpolation methods and with a cross-site validation experiment. When modelling without data from neighbouring stations, the RMSE for NO$_2$ ranged from 9.73 to 11.66 $\mu$g/m$^3$ without traffic information, compared with 8.72 to 11.52 $\mu$g/m$^3$ when traffic information was included. Additionally, for NO$_2$, SHAP analyses indicate that traffic-related variables can contribute at levels comparable to pollutant measurements from neighbouring monitoring stations in traffic-dominated~environments.
Abstract:Vehicular traffic is a major source of air pollution; however, the contribution of remotely acquired traffic information to local machine-learning (ML) air-pollution models remains insufficiently characterised. This study evaluates four interpretable tree-based ML models (Random Forest, Extra Trees, LightGBM, and XGBoost) under six predictor scenarios combining progressively larger predictor sets, ranging from remotely acquired traffic, meteorological, and temporal variables alone to the inclusion of measurements from one and four neighbouring monitoring stations, to estimate NO$_2$, PM$_{10}$, PM$_{2.5}$, and O$_3$ concentrations across several sites in London. ML model performance was compared with a ridge linear regression model as a baseline, with spatial interpolation methods and with a cross-site validation experiment. When modelling without data from neighbouring stations, the RMSE for NO$_2$ ranged from 9.73 to 11.66 $\mu$g/m$^3$ without traffic information, compared with 8.72 to 11.52 $\mu$g/m$^3$ when traffic information was included. Additionally, for NO$_2$, SHAP analyses indicate that traffic-related variables can contribute at levels comparable to pollutant measurements from neighbouring monitoring stations in traffic-dominated~environments.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2608.23219 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2608.23219v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.23219 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Correlation_Matrix_Camden-EustonRoad.png
Correlation_Matrix_CamdenKerbside.png
Correlation_Matrix_LondonMaryleboneRoad.png
Correlation_Matrix_Wandsworth-PutneyHighStreet.png
Correlation_Matrix_Westminster-OxfordStreet.png
OpenWeather_validation_temperature_wind.png
time_series_observed_ML_Ridge_NO2.png
time_series_observed_ML_Ridge_O3.png
time_series_observed_ML_Ridge_PM10.png
time_series_observed_ML_Ridge_PM25.png
(5 additional files not shown) You must enabled JavaScript to view entire file list.
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 281 words
Related coverage

Digital States 2026: AI Moves From Experiment to Infrastructure
govtech.com · Sep 24, 2026
The hard physics and complex economics of AI’s insatiable hunger for power
SiliconANGLE · Sep 11, 2026
How bad would it be if GPS satellites were shot down?
LessWrong · Jun 12, 2026

Vertical Advantage: Transforming Industries with Lakebase and Agentic AI
Databricks · Aug 27, 2026