Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This research identifies a counterintuitive "small-vs-large gap" where repeating smaller datasets accelerates training and reduces compute costs compared to using larger ones, challenging conventional scaling laws. The study attributes this speedup to favorable layer-wise growth enabled by specific sampling biases, offering a proactive optimization strategy particularly effective for reasoning tasks. By providing both theoretical analysis and empirical evidence across various architectures, the work suggests that data repetition can be leveraged as an inductive bias rather than merely a fallback for data scarcity.
Sources coveringarXiv, LessWrong, AWS, Databricks
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Less Data, Faster Training: repeating smaller datasets speeds up learning via sampling biases

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2605.20314v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: This work investigates the ``small-vs-large gap'', where repeating on fewer samples can lead to compute saving during training compared to using a larger dataset. This is observed across algorithmic tasks, architectures and optimizers and cannot be explained using prior theory. We argue that the speedup comes from appropriate layer-wise growth enabled by sampling biases, which is more pronounced when the dataset size is smaller. We provide both theoretical analysis and empirical evidence from various interventions. Our results suggest that using a smaller dataset with more repetitions is not just a fallback strategy under data scarcity, but can be proactively leveraged as a favorable inductive biases for optimization, particularly in reasoning tasks.

Abstract:This work investigates the ``small-vs-large gap'', where repeating on fewer samples can lead to compute saving during training compared to using a larger dataset. This is observed across algorithmic tasks, architectures and optimizers and cannot be explained using prior theory. We argue that the speedup comes from appropriate layer-wise growth enabled by sampling biases, which is more pronounced when the dataset size is smaller. We provide both theoretical analysis and empirical evidence from various interventions. Our results suggest that using a smaller dataset with more repetitions is not just a fallback strategy under data scarcity, but can be proactively leveraged as a favorable inductive biases for optimization, particularly in reasoning tasks.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2605.20314 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2605.20314v2 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.20314 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 206 words

Related coverage