Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This paper addresses critical bottlenecks in Graph Neural Networks by introducing LEED, a node-level metric that tracks embedding evolution to detect over-smoothing and guide virtual node selection. By offering finer-grained diagnostics than global measures like Dirichlet energy, the method effectively mitigates information compression issues without sacrificing overall model performance. The work advances the theoretical understanding of representation dynamics in deep graph architectures, providing actionable tools for improving GNN scalability and accuracy.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

LEED: Local Embedding Evolution Distance for over-smoothing estimation and virtual node selection in GNN

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2608.09596v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) suffer from two fundamental limitations: over-smoothing, where node representations become indistinguishable with depth, and over-squashing, where long-range information is compressed through limited message-passing channels. Existing metrics such as Dirichlet energy provide global characterizations of over-smoothing but lack the resolution to analyze node-level behavior and guide architectural improvements. In this paper, we propose LEED (Local Embedding Evolution Distance), a novel local metric that quantifies over-smoothing by tracking the evolution of individual node embeddings across layers. By operating at the node level, LEED enables fine-grained analysis of representation dynamics during training, revealing heterogeneous over-smoothing patterns that are invisible to global energy-based measures. This locality induces informative node importance scores, interpreted as embedding-driven centrality measures. We leverage LEED to design a more efficient strategy for virtual node selection. Unlike existing approaches that depend on multiple heuristic centrality measures, our method uses LEED as a unique criterion to guide the construction of Local Virtual Nodes to mitigate over-squashing. Experiments show that LEED provides more informative diagnostics than Dirichlet energy while preserving global evaluation, and enables more effective virtual node integration, improving GNN performance across datasets.

Abstract:Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) suffer from two fundamental limitations: over-smoothing, where node representations become indistinguishable with depth, and over-squashing, where long-range information is compressed through limited message-passing channels. Existing metrics such as Dirichlet energy provide global characterizations of over-smoothing but lack the resolution to analyze node-level behavior and guide architectural improvements. In this paper, we propose LEED (Local Embedding Evolution Distance), a novel local metric that quantifies over-smoothing by tracking the evolution of individual node embeddings across layers. By operating at the node level, LEED enables fine-grained analysis of representation dynamics during training, revealing heterogeneous over-smoothing patterns that are invisible to global energy-based measures. This locality induces informative node importance scores, interpreted as embedding-driven centrality measures. We leverage LEED to design a more efficient strategy for virtual node selection. Unlike existing approaches that depend on multiple heuristic centrality measures, our method uses LEED as a unique criterion to guide the construction of Local Virtual Nodes to mitigate over-squashing. Experiments show that LEED provides more informative diagnostics than Dirichlet energy while preserving global evaluation, and enables more effective virtual node integration, improving GNN performance across datasets.

This work has been submitted to the IEEE for possible publication. Copyright may be transferred without notice, after which this version may no longer be accessible

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2608.09596 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2608.09596v2 [cs.LG] for this version)

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 225 words

Related coverage