aiqbench analysis
This research advances safety-critical control theory by optimizing hyperplane orientations in Control Barrier Functions, significantly reducing the gap between desired and safe commands for dynamic systems. The method offers a mathematically rigorous way to maintain provable safety guarantees while enabling more agile navigation around complex obstacles with limited computational resources. By refining the constraints on dynamic agents, this work directly enhances the reliability of autonomous robots operating in cluttered environments.
Least Restrictive Hyperplane Control Barrier Functions
arXiv:2510.18643v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Control Barrier Functions (CBFs) can provide provable safety guarantees for dynamic systems. However, finding a valid CBF for a system of interest is often non-trivial, especially for systems with low computational resources, higher-order dynamics, and moving close to obstacles of complex shape. A common solution to this problem is to use a purely distance-based CBF. In this paper, we study Hyperplane CBFs (H-CBFs), where a hyperplane separates the agent from the obstacle. First, we note that the common distance-based CBF is a special case of an H-CBF where the hyperplane is a supporting hyperplane of the obstacle that is orthogonal to a line between the agent and the closest point of the obstacle. We then show that a less conservative CBF can be found by optimising over the orientation of the supporting hyperplane, in order to find the Least Restrictive Hyperplane CBF. This enables us to maintain the safety guarantees while allowing controls that are closer to the desired ones, especially when moving fast and passing close to obstacles. We illustrate the approach on a double integrator dynamical system with acceleration constraints, moving through a group of arbitrarily shaped static and moving obstacles, and show that the proposed approach reduces the average gap between desired and safe controls by an order of magnitude.
Abstract:Control Barrier Functions (CBFs) can provide provable safety guarantees for dynamic systems. However, finding a valid CBF for a system of interest is often non-trivial, especially for systems with low computational resources, higher-order dynamics, and moving close to obstacles of complex shape. A common solution to this problem is to use a purely distance-based CBF. In this paper, we study Hyperplane CBFs (H-CBFs), where a hyperplane separates the agent from the obstacle. First, we note that the common distance-based CBF is a special case of an H-CBF where the hyperplane is a supporting hyperplane of the obstacle that is orthogonal to a line between the agent and the closest point of the obstacle. We then show that a less conservative CBF can be found by optimising over the orientation of the supporting hyperplane, in order to find the Least Restrictive Hyperplane CBF. This enables us to maintain the safety guarantees while allowing controls that are closer to the desired ones, especially when moving fast and passing close to obstacles. We illustrate the approach on a double integrator dynamical system with acceleration constraints, moving through a group of arbitrarily shaped static and moving obstacles, and show that the proposed approach reduces the average gap between desired and safe controls by an order of magnitude.
Robotics (cs.RO)
arXiv:2510.18643 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2510.18643v3 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.18643 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 304 words
Related coverage
[AINews] High Taste Testers Ep. 1
Latent Space · Oct 17, 2026

Tariffs didn’t bring manufacturing jobs back to the US
The Verge · Jul 27, 2026
Problems of Proliferation
LessWrong · Sep 29, 2026
How to Train Your Latent Control Barrier Function: Smooth Safety Filtering Under Hard-to-Model Constraints
arXiv · Oct 14, 2026