aiqbench analysis
This research identifies "correct-set turnover" as a critical hidden cost in RLVR where models lose previously solved problems during training, proposing a retention-aware review mechanism that exploits a low-cost "repair window" to mitigate regression. By utilizing pre-rollout batch replacement, the new method achieves zero additional rollout overhead while consistently outperforming standard baselines across diverse benchmarks and modalities. For practitioners, this highlights the necessity of explicitly optimizing for retention alongside acquisition to prevent accuracy degradation in long-term RLVR pipelines.
Learning to Solve, Forgetting to Retain: Correct-Set Turnover in RLVR
arXiv:2606.03087v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) improves the ability of large language model, yet headline accuracy gains often conceal a hidden cost: previously solved problems quietly become unsolvable as training proceeds. We frame this phenomenon as \emph{correct-set turnover}, representing the coupled dynamics of solution acquisition and regression over the mastered set. Under this view, retention becomes an explicit optimization target alongside acquisition. We analytically and empirically establish the \emph{repair-window principle}: the cost of restoring a regressed prompt grows sharply with review delay, defining a low-cost window that standard RLVR pipelines fail to exploit. To address this, we propose \textbf{\method{}}, a retention-aware review mechanism that tracks mastered prompts and periodically reintroduces them to \textbf{remind} the model of previous solutions. By utilizing pre-rollout batch replacement, \method{} incurs zero additional rollout overhead. Evaluated across 20 benchmarks spanning image-text, video, and text-only tasks with Qwen3-VL and Qwen2.5-Math, \method{} consistently improves performance over GRPO, DAPO, and replay baselines, demonstrating robust generalizability across modalities and algorithms.
Abstract:Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) improves the ability of large language model, yet headline accuracy gains often conceal a hidden cost: previously solved problems quietly become unsolvable as training proceeds. We frame this phenomenon as \emph{correct-set turnover}, representing the coupled dynamics of solution acquisition and regression over the mastered set. Under this view, retention becomes an explicit optimization target alongside acquisition. We analytically and empirically establish the \emph{repair-window principle}: the cost of restoring a regressed prompt grows sharply with review delay, defining a low-cost window that standard RLVR pipelines fail to exploit. To address this, we propose \textbf{\method{}}, a retention-aware review mechanism that tracks mastered prompts and periodically reintroduces them to \textbf{remind} the model of previous solutions. By utilizing pre-rollout batch replacement, \method{} incurs zero additional rollout overhead. Evaluated across 20 benchmarks spanning image-text, video, and text-only tasks with Qwen3-VL and Qwen2.5-Math, \method{} consistently improves performance over GRPO, DAPO, and replay baselines, demonstrating robust generalizability across modalities and algorithms.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2606.03087 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2606.03087v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.03087 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 254 words
Related coverage
Learning to Solve, Forgetting to Retain: Correct-Set Turnover in RLVR
arXiv · Sep 30, 2026

How can LLM RL Work Despite Information-Theoretic Inefficiency
LessWrong · Oct 16, 2026

Jev: System One models for Prod, not God — with Diogo Almeida, CEO, TypeSafe AI
Latent Space · Sep 21, 2026

Mastering Agentic Techniques: AI Agent Customization
NVIDIA · May 20, 2026