aiqbench analysis
This research introduces a multi-armed bandit framework for automated essay scoring that adaptively selects LLM prompts during inference, significantly reducing operational costs without sacrificing accuracy. By transforming prompt selection from an offline hyperparameter tuning task into an online learning process, the method offers a practical solution for educational platforms managing high-volume assessment needs. The study provides critical insights into balancing token usage and latency against scoring validity in real-world deployment scenarios.
Learning to Grade Efficiently: A Bandit-Driven Prompt-Selection Framework for Low-Cost LLM Essay Scoring
arXiv:2608.23814v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate strong capabilities in automated essay scoring (AES), but contemporary approaches typically employ fixed prompt selection, failing to address operational cost concerns and evolving optimal configurations. We propose a novel cost-aware approach that treats each prompt type as an arm in a multi-armed bandit (MAB) controller, enabling adaptive selection of optimal prompting strategies during inference. Our experiments on IELTS Writing Task 2 essays show that the MAB framework achieves comparable scoring accuracy to exhaustive grid search while reducing LLM calls by 78.4\% to find the best grading approach. We implemented four distinct grading recipes (multi-step vs. single-step assessment, with vs. without calibration examples) and found that the multi-step approach with examples achieves the highest accuracy. By tracking token usage and latency alongside agreement metrics, we produce the first cost-reliability learning curves for essay scoring, providing actionable insights for educational technology platforms that must balance operational costs against assessment validity. This work represents the first application of online control mechanisms to adaptively select prompting strategies in AES, transforming prompt selection from an offline hyperparameter optimization problem into an efficient online learning task.
Abstract:Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate strong capabilities in automated essay scoring (AES), but contemporary approaches typically employ fixed prompt selection, failing to address operational cost concerns and evolving optimal configurations. We propose a novel cost-aware approach that treats each prompt type as an arm in a multi-armed bandit (MAB) controller, enabling adaptive selection of optimal prompting strategies during inference. Our experiments on IELTS Writing Task 2 essays show that the MAB framework achieves comparable scoring accuracy to exhaustive grid search while reducing LLM calls by 78.4\% to find the best grading approach. We implemented four distinct grading recipes (multi-step vs. single-step assessment, with vs. without calibration examples) and found that the multi-step approach with examples achieves the highest accuracy. By tracking token usage and latency alongside agreement metrics, we produce the first cost-reliability learning curves for essay scoring, providing actionable insights for educational technology platforms that must balance operational costs against assessment validity. This work represents the first application of online control mechanisms to adaptively select prompting strategies in AES, transforming prompt selection from an offline hyperparameter optimization problem into an efficient online learning task.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
I.2.6; I.2.7; K.3.1
arXiv:2608.23814 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2608.23814v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.23814 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 289 words
Related coverage

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jun 7, 2026

NVIDIA GTC Taipei at COMPUTEX: Live Updates on What’s Next in AI
NVIDIA · May 21, 2026

Teaching LLMs to Update Beliefs for Efficient Long-Horizon Interaction
BAIR Blog · Jul 26, 2026

What are Agentic Workflows?
Databricks · Aug 6, 2026