aiqbench analysis
This paper introduces Recursia, a framework for recursively self-improving shared executable stacks to enable zero-shot long-horizon robot manipulation. By treating the stack as a persistent unit of improvement rather than individual task programs, it effectively handles failures in tool capabilities and state handoffs during skill composition. The approach demonstrates significant gains in both simulation and physical experiments using Franka robots, validating its potential for scalable robotic programming.
Learning to Compose: Recursive Self-Improvement of Shared Executable Stacks for Zero-Shot Long-Horizon Robot Manipulation
arXiv:2610.24464v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Individually competent robot skills can fail when composed: tools may lack a required capability, completion signals may misrepresent physical progress, and one skill may leave a state that violates its successor's prerequisites. We introduce Recursia, a recursive self-improvement framework that treats the shared executable stack, rather than individual task programs, as the persistent unit of improvement. The stack integrates tools, skills with execution contracts, handoffs, and verifiers. Source-side execution traces guide failure attribution and the generation of missing tools or repairs to existing shared components. Generality checks, mechanism tests, and paired selection and regression gates determine which changes become the next parent. The resulting stack is frozen and reused through declarative task adapters, allowing source-derived changes to support new compositions without target-side code repair. Experiments cover LIBERO-Pro Long simulation and a physical Franka FR3 equipped with a Franka Hand. In simulation, Recursia improves success over ASPIRE by 5.8 percentage points under Pos perturbations and 15.1 points under Task perturbations. Across three physical compositional target tasks, it improves mean success over the Skill Document Only baseline by 40 percentage points. Analyses of constituent execution, candidate rejection, and inference drivers distinguish local mechanism improvements from complete task success and characterize the cost of feedback-conditioned orchestration. These results examine shared executable interfaces as a concrete mechanism for compositional transfer in robot programming.
Abstract:Individually competent robot skills can fail when composed: tools may lack a required capability, completion signals may misrepresent physical progress, and one skill may leave a state that violates its successor's prerequisites. We introduce Recursia, a recursive self-improvement framework that treats the shared executable stack, rather than individual task programs, as the persistent unit of improvement. The stack integrates tools, skills with execution contracts, handoffs, and verifiers. Source-side execution traces guide failure attribution and the generation of missing tools or repairs to existing shared components. Generality checks, mechanism tests, and paired selection and regression gates determine which changes become the next parent. The resulting stack is frozen and reused through declarative task adapters, allowing source-derived changes to support new compositions without target-side code repair. Experiments cover LIBERO-Pro Long simulation and a physical Franka FR3 equipped with a Franka Hand. In simulation, Recursia improves success over ASPIRE by 5.8 percentage points under Pos perturbations and 15.1 points under Task perturbations. Across three physical compositional target tasks, it improves mean success over the Skill Document Only baseline by 40 percentage points. Analyses of constituent execution, candidate rejection, and inference drivers distinguish local mechanism improvements from complete task success and characterize the cost of feedback-conditioned orchestration. These results examine shared executable interfaces as a concrete mechanism for compositional transfer in robot programming.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2610.24464 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2610.24464v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.24464 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 313 words
Related coverage
Dyna-2: General Purpose Physical Agents with Hour-Long Autonomy — Jason Ma, Dyna Robotics
Latent Space · Oct 13, 2026

Why I Left Google DeepMind
LessWrong · Jul 15, 2026
What's Continual Learning, and Why Might We Expect To See It In Advanced LLM Agents?
LessWrong · Jun 12, 2026

[AINews] Reality Checks on AI News (Yegge shuts down Gas Town, Databricks’ +60% Astra cost)
Latent Space · Sep 17, 2026