Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research tackles the optimization of task allocation between humans and AI models, specifically addressing capacity constraints in sequential decision-making environments. By developing explore-exploit policies that account for agent expertise and context, the study demonstrates measurable performance gains across diverse prediction tasks involving large language models. The work advances the field of human-AI collaboration by providing a theoretical framework for managing limited computational and cognitive resources efficiently.
Sources coveringarXiv, LessWrong, Quantum Computing Report, Quantum Zeitgeist
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Learning to Assign Prediction Tasks to Agents with Capacity Constraints

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2605.27999v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We address the problem of learning to assign prediction tasks to one agent from a set of available agents, including human decision-makers and AI models. We focus on sequential learning of agent expertise and assignment policies where each agent is constrained to handle a fraction of tasks. We provide a general theoretical characterization of this problem in terms of agent capacities, differences in agent expertise, and task context. We then develop a framework of sequential explore-exploit policy-learning algorithms that seek to maximize overall performance. Experimental results over a variety of tabular, image, and text prediction tasks demonstrate systematic gains from our policy-learning algorithms relative to non-contextual baselines across different types of agents, including LLMs and humans.

Abstract:We address the problem of learning to assign prediction tasks to one agent from a set of available agents, including human decision-makers and AI models. We focus on sequential learning of agent expertise and assignment policies where each agent is constrained to handle a fraction of tasks. We provide a general theoretical characterization of this problem in terms of agent capacities, differences in agent expertise, and task context. We then develop a framework of sequential explore-exploit policy-learning algorithms that seek to maximize overall performance. Experimental results over a variety of tabular, image, and text prediction tasks demonstrate systematic gains from our policy-learning algorithms relative to non-contextual baselines across different types of agents, including LLMs and humans.

Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2605.27999 [cs.HC]

(or arXiv:2605.27999v2 [cs.HC] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.27999 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 211 words

Related coverage