aiqbench analysis
This research advances data-driven control theory by integrating Bayesian methods into Linear Parameter-Varying (LPV) state-space modeling to explicitly quantify model uncertainty. By addressing both measurement noise and structural bias, the approach enables more reliable stability analysis and controller design for complex nonlinear systems without requiring extensive manual validation. The work bridges machine learning techniques with rigorous systems engineering, offering a pathway toward safer deployment of AI-driven control algorithms in critical infrastructure.
Learning Surrogate LPV State-Space Models with Uncertainty Quantification
arXiv:2603.29532v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The Linear Parameter-Varying (LPV) framework enables the construction of surrogate models of complex nonlinear and high-dimensional systems, facilitating efficient stability and performance analysis together with controller design. Despite significant advances in data-driven LPV modelling, existing approaches do not quantify the uncertainty of the obtained LPV models. Consequently, assessing model reliability for analysis and control or detecting operation outside the training regime requires extensive validation and user expertise. This paper proposes a Bayesian approach for the joint estimation of LPV state-space models, including their scheduling map, together with characterization of the model uncertainty and confidence bounds on the predicted model response directly from input-output data. Both aleatoric uncertainty due to measurement noise and epistemic uncertainty arising from limited training data and structural bias are considered. The resulting model preserves the LPV structure required for controller synthesis while enabling computationally efficient simulation and uncertainty propagation. The approach is demonstrated on the surrogate modelling of a two-dimensional nonlinear interconnection of mass-spring-damper systems.
Abstract:The Linear Parameter-Varying (LPV) framework enables the construction of surrogate models of complex nonlinear and high-dimensional systems, facilitating efficient stability and performance analysis together with controller design. Despite significant advances in data-driven LPV modelling, existing approaches do not quantify the uncertainty of the obtained LPV models. Consequently, assessing model reliability for analysis and control or detecting operation outside the training regime requires extensive validation and user expertise. This paper proposes a Bayesian approach for the joint estimation of LPV state-space models, including their scheduling map, together with characterization of the model uncertainty and confidence bounds on the predicted model response directly from input-output data. Both aleatoric uncertainty due to measurement noise and epistemic uncertainty arising from limited training data and structural bias are considered. The resulting model preserves the LPV structure required for controller synthesis while enabling computationally efficient simulation and uncertainty propagation. The approach is demonstrated on the surrogate modelling of a two-dimensional nonlinear interconnection of mass-spring-damper systems.
Systems and Control (eess.SY); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2603.29532 [eess.SY]
(or arXiv:2603.29532v2 [eess.SY] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.29532 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 255 words
Related coverage
Structure-Preserving Neural Surrogates with Tractable Uncertainty Quantification
arXiv · Jun 12, 2026
Modelling magnetic material properties with uncertainty-aware neural networks
arXiv · Oct 6, 2026
U-Space: Uncovering When and Why Uncertainty Arises in Language Models
arXiv · Oct 8, 2026
Biased Dreams: Limitations to Epistemic Uncertainty Quantification in Latent Dynamics Models
arXiv · Jul 28, 2026