Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This research introduces LeSAMP, an RL-based framework that automates the selection of diffusion model sampling parameters like guidance scales and noise schedules based on prompts. By treating parameter tuning as a learnable policy rather than a static manual process, it achieves significant improvements in image quality over existing baselines across Flux.1 and Stable Diffusion 3.5. The work represents a meaningful step toward reducing the operational overhead of high-fidelity generative AI workflows while maintaining output fidelity.
Sources coveringarXiv, AI Alignment Forum, jp.ibtimes.com, LessWrong
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Learning Sampling Parameters for Diffusion Models

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2607.23488v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Text-to-image diffusion models expose many inference-time sampling parameters, including prompts, negative prompts, classifier-free guidance scales, and noise schedules. These parameters are typically manually chosen once and then held fixed across prompts and denoising timesteps, even though different prompts and stages of generation can benefit from different parameter values. We introduce LeSAMP, a framework for learning prompt-conditioned, timestep-varying sampling parameters. We formulate parameter selection as a reinforcement learning problem: Given a user prompt, a large language model is trained to emit schedules for the chosen sampling parameters. We optimize our model using rewards from human preference models and VLM-as-a-judge. We evaluate our model on Flux.1 [dev] and Stable Diffusion 3.5, and find that compared to baselines, LeSAMP has a win rate of up to 68.12% using human preference scores and 73.37% using VLM-as-a-judge. These gains are validated in a user study where we achieve win rates of up to 59.46% over previous baselines. Our results suggest that learned sampling-parameter policies provide a complementary approach to existing post-training methods for improving diffusion model outputs.

Abstract:Text-to-image diffusion models expose many inference-time sampling parameters, including prompts, negative prompts, classifier-free guidance scales, and noise schedules. These parameters are typically manually chosen once and then held fixed across prompts and denoising timesteps, even though different prompts and stages of generation can benefit from different parameter values. We introduce LeSAMP, a framework for learning prompt-conditioned, timestep-varying sampling parameters. We formulate parameter selection as a reinforcement learning problem: Given a user prompt, a large language model is trained to emit schedules for the chosen sampling parameters. We optimize our model using rewards from human preference models and VLM-as-a-judge. We evaluate our model on Flux.1 [dev] and Stable Diffusion 3.5, and find that compared to baselines, LeSAMP has a win rate of up to 68.12% using human preference scores and 73.37% using VLM-as-a-judge. These gains are validated in a user study where we achieve win rates of up to 59.46% over previous baselines. Our results suggest that learned sampling-parameter policies provide a complementary approach to existing post-training methods for improving diffusion model outputs.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)

arXiv:2607.23488 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2607.23488v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.23488 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 272 words

Related coverage