aiqbench analysis
This research introduces Reasoning State Propagation (RSP), a novel framework that links intermediate reasoning steps to final outcomes by modeling state validity transitions. By leveraging scalable outcome supervision alongside limited process annotations, the method significantly improves performance in reinforcement learning and reasoning search tasks without requiring exhaustive step-by-step labels. This advancement addresses a critical bottleneck in training process reward models, enabling more efficient scaling of AI reasoning capabilities.
Learning Process Rewards via Reasoning State Propagation
arXiv:2609.39220v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Process reward models (PRMs) have demonstrated notable effectiveness in test-time scaling and reinforcement learning by providing fine-grained signals for evaluating intermediate reasoning states, but their training relies heavily on costly process annotations. A natural way to alleviate this dependence is to complement limited process supervision with scalable outcome supervision. However, existing PRMs often model reasoning prefixes independently, providing no explicit mechanism for effectively using final outcome to guide the learning of intermediate reasoning states. We introduce Reasoning State Propagation (RSP), which represents each reasoning prefix with a binary validity state and models transitions between successive states across the reasoning trajectory. Specifically, RSP predicts a break probability that a valid state becomes invalid and a repair probability that an invalid state returns to valid. By propagating these transitions, RSP connects intermediate states to the final state, allowing process annotations to supervise intermediate states while outcome labels supervise the final state and can provide learning signals to preceding steps. Across reasoning search, response selection, and reinforcement learning, RSP consistently outperforms representative PRM baselines, with average improvements over Qwen2.5-Math-PRM of 5.6% in beam search and 2.1% in reinforcement learning.
Abstract:Process reward models (PRMs) have demonstrated notable effectiveness in test-time scaling and reinforcement learning by providing fine-grained signals for evaluating intermediate reasoning states, but their training relies heavily on costly process annotations. A natural way to alleviate this dependence is to complement limited process supervision with scalable outcome supervision. However, existing PRMs often model reasoning prefixes independently, providing no explicit mechanism for effectively using final outcome to guide the learning of intermediate reasoning states. We introduce Reasoning State Propagation (RSP), which represents each reasoning prefix with a binary validity state and models transitions between successive states across the reasoning trajectory. Specifically, RSP predicts a break probability that a valid state becomes invalid and a repair probability that an invalid state returns to valid. By propagating these transitions, RSP connects intermediate states to the final state, allowing process annotations to supervise intermediate states while outcome labels supervise the final state and can provide learning signals to preceding steps. Across reasoning search, response selection, and reinforcement learning, RSP consistently outperforms representative PRM baselines, with average improvements over Qwen2.5-Math-PRM of 5.6% in beam search and 2.1% in reinforcement learning.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2609.39220 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2609.39220v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.39220 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 283 words
Related coverage
How might continual learning affect safety and alignment?
LessWrong · Jun 13, 2026
A Mike's-Eye View of ARC's Research
AI Alignment Forum · Jun 9, 2026

Game Design Creativity evals
LessWrong · Oct 12, 2026

Reflection’s Beam model hits 501 billion parameters
Quantum Zeitgeist · Oct 5, 2026