Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Safety

aiqbench analysis

This research introduces a Learning from Haptics (LfH) framework that uses differentiable Control Barrier Functions to personalize safety interventions in human-robot shared control systems based on sparse user demonstrations. By automatically adjusting controller parameters to match individual haptic preferences, the method eliminates manual tuning while preserving intuitive teleoperation dynamics. The approach represents a significant step toward adaptive robotic assistance where safety constraints are dynamically aligned with specific operator behaviors rather than relying on rigid, predefined strategies.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Learning Personalized Safety Interventions for Haptic Human-Robot Shared Control

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2607.19534v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Haptic feedback provides an implicit channel for communicating safety intentions during human-robot shared control. Existing haptic guidance systems typically employ predefined intervention strategies that cannot accommodate the diverse safety preferences of individual users or application scenarios. To address this limitation, we propose a Learning from Haptics (LfH) framework that learns user-preferred safety interventions from sparse demonstrations, eliminating the need for manual trial-and-error design. Our framework is built on a differentiable Control Barrier Function (CBF)-based optimization layer that automatically adjusts the underlying safety parameters to match the demonstrated haptic responses. Instead of tuning controller parameters directly, users teach the system how they expect it to intervene during teleoperation. The resulting haptic guidance reflects the demonstrated intervention preferences while preserving the intuitive interaction of haptic shared control. Simulation and hardware experiments demonstrate that the proposed framework can learn personalized safety interventions from sparse user input and reduce the mismatch between the generated haptic feedback and the demonstrated preferences.

Abstract:Haptic feedback provides an implicit channel for communicating safety intentions during human-robot shared control. Existing haptic guidance systems typically employ predefined intervention strategies that cannot accommodate the diverse safety preferences of individual users or application scenarios. To address this limitation, we propose a Learning from Haptics (LfH) framework that learns user-preferred safety interventions from sparse demonstrations, eliminating the need for manual trial-and-error design. Our framework is built on a differentiable Control Barrier Function (CBF)-based optimization layer that automatically adjusts the underlying safety parameters to match the demonstrated haptic responses. Instead of tuning controller parameters directly, users teach the system how they expect it to intervene during teleoperation. The resulting haptic guidance reflects the demonstrated intervention preferences while preserving the intuitive interaction of haptic shared control. Simulation and hardware experiments demonstrate that the proposed framework can learn personalized safety interventions from sparse user input and reduce the mismatch between the generated haptic feedback and the demonstrated preferences.

Robotics (cs.RO)

arXiv:2607.19534 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2607.19534v1 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.19534 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 249 words

Related coverage