aiqbench analysis
This research introduces LeNO, a method that learns noise corrections for few-step generative models using Local GRPO to eliminate costly per-sample search at inference. By amortizing reward-guided optimization into a learned residual transport while keeping the generator frozen, it improves target rewards in text-to-image and protein structure generation without iterative test-time optimization. The approach offers a principled regularization objective via KL divergence bounds, addressing the limitations of existing trajectory-free alignment techniques for deterministic generators.
Learning Noise Optimization for Reward Alignment in Few-Step Generative Models
arXiv:2611.06255v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Reward alignment for diffusion- and flow-based generative models is often formulated over stochastic trajectories, making it less suitable for few-step deterministic generators. Initial noise optimization provides a trajectory-free alternative, but existing gradient-free methods require costly per-sample search at inference. We introduce LeNO (Learning Noise Optimization), which amortizes reward-guided initial noise optimization into a learned residual transport while keeping the pretrained generator frozen. LeNO learns an anchor-conditioned distribution over noise corrections using Local GRPO and scalar rewards, eliminating iterative test-time optimization. For Gaussian initial noise with norm-preserving projection, we derive a tractable upper bound on the KL divergence between the corrected noise distribution and the original prior, providing a principled regularization objective. We evaluate LeNO on few-step text-to-image and protein structure generation, including expensive black-box designability rewards. Across both domains, LeNO improves target rewards with a single noise correction at inference while largely preserving generation quality and diversity.
Abstract:Reward alignment for diffusion- and flow-based generative models is often formulated over stochastic trajectories, making it less suitable for few-step deterministic generators. Initial noise optimization provides a trajectory-free alternative, but existing gradient-free methods require costly per-sample search at inference. We introduce LeNO (Learning Noise Optimization), which amortizes reward-guided initial noise optimization into a learned residual transport while keeping the pretrained generator frozen. LeNO learns an anchor-conditioned distribution over noise corrections using Local GRPO and scalar rewards, eliminating iterative test-time optimization. For Gaussian initial noise with norm-preserving projection, we derive a tractable upper bound on the KL divergence between the corrected noise distribution and the original prior, providing a principled regularization objective. We evaluate LeNO on few-step text-to-image and protein structure generation, including expensive black-box designability rewards. Across both domains, LeNO improves target rewards with a single noise correction at inference while largely preserving generation quality and diversity.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)
arXiv:2611.06255 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2611.06255v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2611.06255 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 248 words
Related coverage
Contextual Decision Making: Predictive or Generative
arXiv · Oct 27, 2026
UI-UG 2: Advancing Mobile UI Understanding and Generation with Fine-Grained Supervision and Reinforcement Learning
arXiv · Nov 4, 2026
When Optimization Becomes Manipulation: Defending Generative Search against Malicious Generative Engine Optimization
arXiv · Sep 5, 2026

Launching UI for generative AI inference recommendations in Amazon SageMaker AI
AWS · Jul 13, 2026