aiqbench analysis
This arXiv paper studies how GUI agents built on vision-language models should store and retrieve past experience, finding that the best memory format (text or image) depends on the step in the task. It proposes SwitchMem, a router that picks the memory modality at each step, and reports gains over static-memory baselines on three GUI benchmarks. Readers should note that these results come from the authors' benchmarks and haven't been independently validated, but the step-level finding is a useful design consideration for anyone building agent memory.
Learning How to Remember: Memory Modality Selection for GUI Agents
arXiv:2610.17928v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Recent advances in vision-language models (VLMs) have substantially improved the capabilities of GUI agents, while memory augmentation has emerged as a promising approach for reusing knowledge from past interactions. However, existing memory augmented GUI agents typically adopt a fixed representation strategy, providing retrieved experience as a static modality. It remains unclear whether a single memory modality is consistently optimal, or how modality preference changes across interaction steps. In this work, we conduct a systematic study of memory modality in VLM based GUI agents. Across GUI benchmarks, we find that the preferred memory representation is strongly step dependent. Motivated by the finding, we introduce \textbf{SwitchMem}, a routing framework that dynamically selects between textual and visual memory representations at each step. Across three GUI benchmarks, SwitchMem outperforms memory augmented baselines that rely on static memory representations. Our findings validate our claim that memory modality is a step dependent decision rather than a fixed design choice. Code and project resources are available at https://txxnrd.github.io/switchmem
Abstract:Recent advances in vision-language models (VLMs) have substantially improved the capabilities of GUI agents, while memory augmentation has emerged as a promising approach for reusing knowledge from past interactions. However, existing memory augmented GUI agents typically adopt a fixed representation strategy, providing retrieved experience as a static modality. It remains unclear whether a single memory modality is consistently optimal, or how modality preference changes across interaction steps. In this work, we conduct a systematic study of memory modality in VLM based GUI agents. Across GUI benchmarks, we find that the preferred memory representation is strongly step dependent. Motivated by the finding, we introduce \textbf{SwitchMem}, a routing framework that dynamically selects between textual and visual memory representations at each step. Across three GUI benchmarks, SwitchMem outperforms memory augmented baselines that rely on static memory representations. Our findings validate our claim that memory modality is a step dependent decision rather than a fixed design choice. Code and project resources are available at this https URL
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2610.17928 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2610.17928v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.17928 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 257 words
Related coverage
What's Continual Learning, and Why Might We Expect To See It In Advanced LLM Agents?
LessWrong · Jun 12, 2026

AgentOps: Operationalize agentic AI at scale with Amazon Bedrock AgentCore
AWS · Jun 1, 2026
What Should Embodied Agents Remember? Benchmarking and Evaluating Memory Modality for Embodied Agents
arXiv · Oct 12, 2026

Presentation: Postgres for Production Agents: Your Relational Foundation for Enterprise AI
InfoQ · Jul 15, 2026