Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This research introduces an adaptive gradient descent method that leverages one-sided Hölder regularity to optimize step sizes based on directional curvature rather than full gradient variation. By proving explicit stationarity bounds and demonstrating superior performance on nonconvex benchmarks, the study offers a more efficient optimization signal for machine learning training dynamics.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Learning from the Descent Direction: Adaptive Gradient Descent under One-Sided H\"older Regularity

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2607.22906v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We study adaptive gradient descent for continuously differentiable, possibly nonconvex objectives under one-sided H\"older regularity. Unlike classical H\"older- or Lipschitz-gradient assumptions, which control the full gradient variation, our condition bounds only the directional term appearing in the descent inequality. This can allow less conservative step sizes when large gradient changes are orthogonal to, or favorable along, the update direction. We propose an adaptive scalar-step method based on an estimate of positive one-sided H\"older curvature, combined with a simple sufficient-decrease safeguard. For nonconvex objectives on a convex region containing the accepted update segments, we prove an explicit best-iterate stationarity bound with a rate determined by the H\"older exponent. Unlike predetermined diminishing step-size schemes, the method adapts to the local descent geometry. We evaluate the approach on two full-batch benchmarks designed to separate directional curvature from full gradient variation. On a binary classification problem, the method achieves the lowest final cross-entropy, objective value, and gradient norm, together with the largest classification margin among the compared scalar gradient methods. On a nonconvex H\"older regression problem, it attains the lowest final objective gap and gradient norm. These results indicate that one-sided H\"older curvature is an effective adaptive step-size signal when full-gradient variation is inflated by directions that do not hinder descent.

Abstract:We study adaptive gradient descent for continuously differentiable, possibly nonconvex objectives under one-sided Hölder regularity. Unlike classical Hölder- or Lipschitz-gradient assumptions, which control the full gradient variation, our condition bounds only the directional term appearing in the descent inequality. This can allow less conservative step sizes when large gradient changes are orthogonal to, or favorable along, the update direction. We propose an adaptive scalar-step method based on an estimate of positive one-sided Hölder curvature, combined with a simple sufficient-decrease safeguard. For nonconvex objectives on a convex region containing the accepted update segments, we prove an explicit best-iterate stationarity bound with a rate determined by the Hölder exponent. Unlike predetermined diminishing step-size schemes, the method adapts to the local descent geometry. We evaluate the approach on two full-batch benchmarks designed to separate directional curvature from full gradient variation. On a binary classification problem, the method achieves the lowest final cross-entropy, objective value, and gradient norm, together with the largest classification margin among the compared scalar gradient methods. On a nonconvex Hölder regression problem, it attains the lowest final objective gap and gradient norm. These results indicate that one-sided Hölder curvature is an effective adaptive step-size signal when full-gradient variation is inflated by directions that do not hinder descent.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Optimization and Control (math.OC)

arXiv:2607.22906 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2607.22906v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.22906 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 305 words

Related coverage