aiqbench analysis
This research introduces Root-Cause-Guided On-Policy Distillation (RC-OPD), a technique that improves model reasoning by diagnosing and repairing specific errors in student-generated trajectories rather than relying on generic reference solutions. By anchoring valid progress segments while correcting substantive failures, the method effectively avoids "distillation traps" where models mimic correct answers without resolving underlying logical flaws. Extensive evaluations demonstrate that this targeted approach yields significant performance gains across various datasets and model scales.
Learning from Repaired Reasoning: Root-Cause-Guided On-Policy Distillation
arXiv:2610.03515v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: On-policy self-distillation (OPSD) uses reference solutions as privileged hindsight to supervise student-generated reasoning trajectories. However, reference-based guidance may explain a correct solution without addressing why the student's own reasoning fails. This reasoning mismatch between the guidance provided and the correction needed can encourage the student to borrow correct conclusions while leaving its reasoning errors unresolved. Moreover, applying the same hindsight throughout the trajectory risks a distillation trap, where unnecessary constraints on valid reasoning compete with correction of substantive errors. To address these issues, we propose Root-Cause-Guided On-Policy Distillation (RC-OPD), which uses repairs of the student's own reasoning to provide guidance that addresses its specific errors while building on valid progress. For each failed attempt, RC-OPD locates the earliest substantive error, develops a local correction, and uses the corrected intermediate result as an anchor for the valid prefix. An iterative diagnosis--repair--continuation process tests the repairs through student continuation, identifying further errors within a fixed repair budget. For repair chains that reach a correct answer, root--cause--guided distillation uses failure diagnoses and corrective goals to supervise the erroneous segments, while anchor-guided distillation supports the corresponding valid prefixes with reasoning chains leading to the repaired intermediate results. We evaluate RC-OPD across multiple datasets and model scales. Extensive experiments and analyses show that it mitigates reasoning mismatch and the distillation trap, yielding substantial performance gains.
Abstract:On-policy self-distillation (OPSD) uses reference solutions as privileged hindsight to supervise student-generated reasoning trajectories. However, reference-based guidance may explain a correct solution without addressing why the student's own reasoning fails. This reasoning mismatch between the guidance provided and the correction needed can encourage the student to borrow correct conclusions while leaving its reasoning errors unresolved. Moreover, applying the same hindsight throughout the trajectory risks a distillation trap, where unnecessary constraints on valid reasoning compete with correction of substantive errors. To address these issues, we propose Root-Cause-Guided On-Policy Distillation (RC-OPD), which uses repairs of the student's own reasoning to provide guidance that addresses its specific errors while building on valid progress. For each failed attempt, RC-OPD locates the earliest substantive error, develops a local correction, and uses the corrected intermediate result as an anchor for the valid prefix. An iterative diagnosis--repair--continuation process tests the repairs through student continuation, identifying further errors within a fixed repair budget. For repair chains that reach a correct answer, root--cause--guided distillation uses failure diagnoses and corrective goals to supervise the erroneous segments, while anchor-guided distillation supports the corresponding valid prefixes with reasoning chains leading to the repaired intermediate results. We evaluate RC-OPD across multiple datasets and model scales. Extensive experiments and analyses show that it mitigates reasoning mismatch and the distillation trap, yielding substantial performance gains.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2610.03515 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2610.03515v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.03515 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 315 words
Related coverage
RePaCA: Leveraging Reasoning Large Language Models for Static Automated Patch Correctness Assessment
arXiv · Aug 3, 2026
Links #3: 2026/06 Part 1
LessWrong · Jun 15, 2026

Vertical Advantage: Transforming Industries with Lakebase and Agentic AI
Databricks · Aug 27, 2026

Automated Reasoning policy refinement in Amazon Bedrock
AWS · Aug 3, 2026