aiqbench analysis
This research investigates optimizing literary machine translation by filtering multi-reference datasets based on semantic similarity, finding that medium-to-high similarity data yields superior results compared to low-similarity or unfiltered full datasets. The study further demonstrates that fine-tuning with human expert translations significantly outperforms the use of synthetic LLM-generated data for this specific domain, highlighting the continued necessity of high-quality human input over purely synthetic augmentation.
Learning from Many Voices: Literary MT Using Multi-Reference Human and Synthetic Data
arXiv:2412.18707v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Multiple valid translations of a single literary work naturally exist. We investigate strategies for leveraging these multi-reference datasets to improve literary machine translation. We propose a filtering framework based on semantic similarity to identify source texts whose references display meaningful variation while remaining faithful. We find that fine-tuning with medium to high semantic similarity data substantially outperforms low semantic similarity data. Moreover, using medium and high semantic similarity data achieves comparable or better performance than using the full unfiltered data. Synthetic translations generated by LLMs are economical and convenient alternatives to human expert translations; however, we find fine-tuning on human expert translations outperforms fine-tuning on synthetically augmented data in automatic metrics and human evaluations, demonstrating the indispensable value of human expert translations for fine-tuning literary machine translation models.
Abstract:Multiple valid translations of a single literary work naturally exist. We investigate strategies for leveraging these multi-reference datasets to improve literary machine translation. We propose a filtering framework based on semantic similarity to identify source texts whose references display meaningful variation while remaining faithful. We find that fine-tuning with medium to high semantic similarity data substantially outperforms low semantic similarity data. Moreover, using medium and high semantic similarity data achieves comparable or better performance than using the full unfiltered data. Synthetic translations generated by LLMs are economical and convenient alternatives to human expert translations; however, we find fine-tuning on human expert translations outperforms fine-tuning on synthetically augmented data in automatic metrics and human evaluations, demonstrating the indispensable value of human expert translations for fine-tuning literary machine translation models.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2412.18707 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2412.18707v3 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2412.18707 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 221 words
Related coverage

[AINews] Reality Checks on AI News (Yegge shuts down Gas Town, Databricks’ +60% Astra cost)
Latent Space · Sep 17, 2026

Honest Abacus AI Review: ChatLLM, DeepAgent, AI Studio & More
KDnuggets · Aug 4, 2026

100 things we announced at I/O 2026
Google · May 20, 2026

Presentation: From AI Agent Demo to Production: Automated Testing and Evaluation
InfoQ · Sep 7, 2026