Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This paper addresses the challenge of generating diverse training datasets for motion planning in dynamic environments by introducing a self-supervised framework called Learning from Hallucinating Critical Points (LfH-CP). The method factorizes data synthesis to identify critical obstacle trajectories and procedurally generate varied paths, effectively avoiding common generative failures like mode collapse. Simulation results indicate that planners trained on this synthesized data achieve higher success rates compared to prior hallucination-based methods, offering a scalable solution for robotics navigation without expensive expert demonstrations.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Learning from Hallucinating Critical Points for Navigation in Dynamic Environments

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2509.26513v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Generating large and diverse obstacle datasets to learn motion planning in environments with dynamic obstacles is challenging due to the vast space of possible obstacle trajectories. Inspired by hallucination-based data synthesis approaches, we propose Learning from Hallucinating Critical Points (LfH-CP), a self-supervised framework for creating rich dynamic obstacle datasets based on existing optimal motion plans without requiring expensive expert demonstrations or trial-and-error exploration. LfH-CP factorizes hallucination into two stages: first identifying when and where obstacles must appear in order to result in a near-optimal motion plan, i.e., the critical points, and then procedurally generating diverse trajectories that pass through these points while avoiding collisions. This factorization avoids generative failures such as mode collapse and ensures coverage of diverse dynamic behaviors. We further introduce a diversity metric to quantify dataset richness and show that LfH-CP produces substantially more varied training data than existing baseline. Experiments in simulation demonstrate that planners trained on a LfH-CP generated dataset achieves higher success rates compared to a prior hallucination method.

Abstract:Generating large and diverse obstacle datasets to learn motion planning in environments with dynamic obstacles is challenging due to the vast space of possible obstacle trajectories. Inspired by hallucination-based data synthesis approaches, we propose Learning from Hallucinating Critical Points (LfH-CP), a self-supervised framework for creating rich dynamic obstacle datasets based on existing optimal motion plans without requiring expensive expert demonstrations or trial-and-error exploration. LfH-CP factorizes hallucination into two stages: first identifying when and where obstacles must appear in order to result in a near-optimal motion plan, i.e., the critical points, and then procedurally generating diverse trajectories that pass through these points while avoiding collisions. This factorization avoids generative failures such as mode collapse and ensures coverage of diverse dynamic behaviors. We further introduce a diversity metric to quantify dataset richness and show that LfH-CP produces substantially more varied training data than existing baseline. Experiments in simulation demonstrate that planners trained on a LfH-CP generated dataset achieves higher success rates compared to a prior hallucination method.

Robotics (cs.RO)

arXiv:2509.26513 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2509.26513v2 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2509.26513 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 256 words

Related coverage