aiqbench analysis
This arXiv preprint proposes Fast-Slow Training (FST), which keeps model weights as "slow" parameters and uses optimized context as "fast" weights that learn from textual feedback. The authors report up to 3x better sample efficiency than RL-only training, less drift from the base model, and better continual learning. These are preprint results on reasoning benchmarks, so they need independent replication, but the approach is a useful signal on reducing catastrophic forgetting during LLM post-training.
Learning, Fast and Slow: Towards LLMs That Adapt Continually
arXiv:2605.12484v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are trained for downstream tasks by updating their parameters (e.g., via RL). However, updating model parameters forces them to absorb task-specific information, which can result in catastrophic forgetting and loss of plasticity. In contrast, in-context learning with fixed LLM parameters can cheaply and rapidly adapt to task-specific requirements (e.g., prompt optimization), but cannot by itself typically match the performance gains available through updating LLM parameters. Inspired by how human learning works at multiple time scales (e.g., System 1 vs 2), we propose a fast-slow learning framework for LLMs, instantiated with model parameters as "slow" weights and optimized context as "fast" weights. These fast "weights" can learn from textual feedback to absorb the task-specific information, while allowing slow weights to stay closer to the base model and persist general reasoning behaviors. Fast-Slow Training (FST) is up to 3x more sample-efficient than only slow learning (RL) across reasoning tasks, while consistently reaching a higher performance asymptote. Moreover, FST-trained models remain closer to the base LLM (up to 70% less KL divergence), resulting in less catastrophic forgetting than RL-training. This reduced drift also preserves plasticity: after training on one task, FST trained models adapt more effectively to a subsequent task. In continual learning scenarios, where task domains change on the fly, FST continues to acquire each new task while RL stalls.
Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) are trained for downstream tasks by updating their parameters (e.g., via RL). However, updating model parameters forces them to absorb task-specific information, which can result in catastrophic forgetting and loss of plasticity. In contrast, in-context learning with fixed LLM parameters can cheaply and rapidly adapt to task-specific requirements (e.g., prompt optimization), but cannot by itself typically match the performance gains available through updating LLM parameters. Inspired by how human learning works at multiple time scales (e.g., System 1 vs 2), we propose a fast-slow learning framework for LLMs, instantiated with model parameters as "slow" weights and optimized context as "fast" weights. These fast "weights" can learn from textual feedback to absorb the task-specific information, while allowing slow weights to stay closer to the base model and persist general reasoning behaviors. Fast-Slow Training (FST) is up to 3x more sample-efficient than only slow learning (RL) across reasoning tasks, while consistently reaching a higher performance asymptote. Moreover, FST-trained models remain closer to the base LLM (up to 70% less KL divergence), resulting in less catastrophic forgetting than RL-training. This reduced drift also preserves plasticity: after training on one task, FST trained models adapt more effectively to a subsequent task. In continual learning scenarios, where task domains change on the fly, FST continues to acquire each new task while RL stalls.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
I.2.6; I.2.7; I.2.8; I.2.4
arXiv:2605.12484 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2605.12484v3 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.12484 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 321 words
Related coverage

Humanity’s Last Invention — Richard Socher of Recursive
Latent Space · Sep 14, 2026

Podcast: The Future of AI: from Enterprise Adoption to Open Source Sovereignty
InfoQ · Sep 25, 2026
What's Continual Learning, and Why Might We Expect To See It In Advanced LLM Agents?
LessWrong · Jun 12, 2026

Microsoft’s AI chief says superintelligence is near, but won’t take your job
The Verge · Jun 8, 2026