Learning Decision-Stump Thresholds in Context: Dynamics of Softmax Attention

arXiv:2610.07074v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Estimating a decision threshold requires locating observations near an unknown boundary. We study how gradient-based pretraining learns this statistical rule in a two-parameter softmax-attention model with a fixed feature and inequality direction. Pretraining uses labeled contexts and their true thresholds; a fresh threshold must be inferred from context alone. Under a large-resolution initialization, constant-step gradient descent on $m$ tasks with $n$ examples each produces a frozen estimator with error $\widetilde O((m\wedge n)^{-1}+N^{-1})$ for each fixed interior threshold and every fresh-context size $N$. The two terms separate finite-pretraining accuracy from fresh-context localization. The mechanism is coordinated parameter divergence: population training calibrates the relative label and feature scores, then increases the attention scale as $t^{1/4}$, giving population threshold error $O(t^{-1/4})$. To transfer this mechanism to a fixed finite corpus, we control gradient errors relative to the shrinking directions of progress at successive parameter scales. This certifies a growing training interval without requiring long-time tracking of the population trajectory. We also identify the boundary limitation of the one-head model and explain statistically what a reflected symmetrization could achieve.

Abstract:Estimating a decision threshold requires locating observations near an unknown boundary. We study how gradient-based pretraining learns this statistical rule in a two-parameter softmax-attention model with a fixed feature and inequality direction. Pretraining uses labeled contexts and their true thresholds; a fresh threshold must be inferred from context alone. Under a large-resolution initialization, constant-step gradient descent on $m$ tasks with $n$ examples each produces a frozen estimator with error $\widetilde O((m\wedge n)^{-1}+N^{-1})$ for each fixed interior threshold and every fresh-context size $N$. The two terms separate finite-pretraining accuracy from fresh-context localization. The mechanism is coordinated parameter divergence: population training calibrates the relative label and feature scores, then increases the attention scale as $t^{1/4}$, giving population threshold error $O(t^{-1/4})$. To transfer this mechanism to a fixed finite corpus, we control gradient errors relative to the shrinking directions of progress at successive parameter scales. This certifies a growing training interval without requiring long-time tracking of the population trajectory. We also identify the boundary limitation of the one-head model and explain statistically what a reflected symmetrization could achieve.

Machine Learning (stat.ML); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2610.07074 [stat.ML]

(or arXiv:2610.07074v1 [stat.ML] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.07074 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

aiqbench analysis

Learning Decision-Stump Thresholds in Context: Dynamics of Softmax Attention

Related coverage