aiqbench analysis
This research establishes near-tight sample complexity bounds for Valiant's algorithm in learning CNF formulas from uniform random solutions, resolving theoretical limits for both super-linear and linear regimes. By proving matching lower bounds alongside upper bounds, the work clarifies the fundamental information-theoretic efficiency of this classic machine learning approach under specific structural constraints.
Learning CNF Formulas from Uniform Random Solutions: Near-Tight Sample Complexity for Valiant's Algorithm
arXiv:2609.15268v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We revisit Valiant's algorithm (Commun. ACM'84) for learning $n$-variable CNF formulas with clause size $k$ and variable degree $d$ from i.i.d. uniform random solutions in the local lemma regime. For fixed $t\geq1$, under $k\gtrsim(1+1/t)\log d$, Valiant's algorithm achieves total variation error $\varepsilon$ with $\widetilde{O}(n^{\lceil t \rceil}/\varepsilon)$ sample complexity. For $t>1$, we prove a matching lower bound for Valiant's algorithm. At $t=1$ (covering $0<t<1$), we show Valiant's algorithm has optimal sample complexity up to logarithmic factors by an information-theoretic lower bound $\widetilde\Omega(n/\varepsilon)$.
Abstract:We revisit Valiant's algorithm (Commun. ACM'84) for learning $n$-variable CNF formulas with clause size $k$ and variable degree $d$ from i.i.d. uniform random solutions in the local lemma regime. For fixed $t\geq1$, under $k\gtrsim(1+1/t)\log d$, Valiant's algorithm achieves total variation error $\varepsilon$ with $\widetilde{O}(n^{\lceil t \rceil}/\varepsilon)$ sample complexity. For $t>1$, we prove a matching lower bound for Valiant's algorithm. At $t=1$ (covering $0<t<1$), we show Valiant's algorithm has optimal sample complexity up to logarithmic factors by an information-theoretic lower bound $\widetilde\Omega(n/\varepsilon)$.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS)
arXiv:2609.15268 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.15268v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.15268 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 180 words
Related coverage

The Entangled Dimensions of Decision Theory
LessWrong · Jul 30, 2026
Complexity Barriers to State Preparation in Quantum Approximate Optimization
arXiv · Sep 28, 2026

Challenge: Hand coding weights for efficient sequence memorisation
AI Alignment Forum · Jul 23, 2026

A brief history of quantum vs classical computational advantage
Quantum Journal · Sep 1, 2026