Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This research presents CarSpeedNet, a machine learning model capable of estimating vehicle speed using only accelerometer data from smartphones, eliminating the need for gyroscopes or GPS. The study validates the approach with extensive on-road testing, demonstrating that extending the temporal context window significantly reduces speed estimation error compared to shorter inputs. While the application involves consumer hardware, the core contribution is an advancement in sensor fusion and time-series modeling techniques within machine learning.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Learning-Based Speed Estimation from Accelerometer-Only Inertial Sensing

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2401.07468v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The proposed model, CarSpeedNet, estimates scalar vehicle speed from a window of three-axis smartphone acceleration, without gyroscope, wheel-odometry, vehicle-bus, or positioning input at inference. The reported experiment comprises 13.2 hours of on-road driving. Beyond the network comparison, a finite-context analysis treats window length as part of the sensing problem. For nested histories, the minimum Bayes mean-square error is non-increasing with context; a complementary cue-coverage relation links the same window to the amount of speed-dependent vibration presented to the network and to the observation horizon. At a 1-s input, CarSpeedNet is compared with five temporal-network alternatives; the effect of temporal context is then measured over six window lengths. On the 0.5-hour holdout, a 4-s window yielded a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 1.8 m/s and a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.72 m/s, compared with 2.9 and 1.3 m/s at 1 s. The 178,169-parameter network requires about 0.68 MiB for 32-bit weights.

Abstract:The proposed model, CarSpeedNet, estimates scalar vehicle speed from a window of three-axis smartphone acceleration, without gyroscope, wheel-odometry, vehicle-bus, or positioning input at inference. The reported experiment comprises 13.2 hours of on-road driving. Beyond the network comparison, a finite-context analysis treats window length as part of the sensing problem. For nested histories, the minimum Bayes mean-square error is non-increasing with context; a complementary cue-coverage relation links the same window to the amount of speed-dependent vibration presented to the network and to the observation horizon. At a 1-s input, CarSpeedNet is compared with five temporal-network alternatives; the effect of temporal context is then measured over six window lengths. On the 0.5-hour holdout, a 4-s window yielded a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 1.8 m/s and a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.72 m/s, compared with 2.9 and 1.3 m/s at 1 s. The 178,169-parameter network requires about 0.68 MiB for 32-bit weights.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2401.07468 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2401.07468v4 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.07468 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 245 words

Related coverage