Learning-Augmented and Randomized Algorithms for Line Aggregation with Delays

Abstract:This paper studies learning-augmented and randomized online aggregation with delays on a line metric. We consider advice given as online suggested service lengths, and evaluate the algorithms in terms of robustness and consistency. For each $\lambda \in (0,1]$, we first propose a deterministic learning-augmented \textsc{Balance} algorithm that is $(4/\lambda+1/\lambda^2)$-robust and $(4+\lambda)$-consistent. We also propose a randomized algorithm for the problem in the classical adversarial model, which is $(e+1)$-competitive against an oblivious adversary, improving over the deterministic $5$-competitive \textsc{Balance} benchmark~\cite{bienkowski2013chain}. Notably, this competitive ratio is even lower than the lower bound of $4$ for deterministic online algorithms. Moreover, we establish a lower bound of $e$ on the competitive ratio of randomized online algorithms, improving the previous lower bound of $e/(e-1)$. Besides, we combine the two ideas and obtain a randomized learning-augmented algorithm that is $(e/\lambda+1/\lambda^2)$-robust and $(e+\lambda)$-consistent. Finally, we conduct numerical experiments to complement our theoretical analysis and evaluate the empirical performance of our algorithms.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computational Complexity (cs.CC)

arXiv:2607.27807 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2607.27807v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.27807 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.